Archive for the ‘2012 Presidential Election’ Category
BREAKING NEWS – Obama eligibility appeal in Alabama Supreme Court Judge Roy Moore’s court
Many cases challenging Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have come and gone, but now an appeal has been filed with a state Supreme Court led by a newly elected chief justice who has expressed doubt about Obama’s qualification for office.
Roy Moore was elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court last November, a decade after he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.
Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of the Washington, D.C.-watch dog Judicial Watch and now head of Freedom Watch, filed the appeal Tuesday with the Alabama Supreme Court, asking for oral arguments.
“We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law,” Klayman told WND.
Klayman says he and his team “have great respect for Chief Justice Moore and his integrity and legal acumen.”
“He is one courageous and brave man. There are few in this country.”
The case is an appeal of a dismissal by the Montgomery Circuit Court.
In his brief, Klayman says “credible evidence and information from an official source” was presented to Chapman before the election indicating Obama might not have been qualified for Oval Office.
The complaint argues Chapman failed her constitutional duty as secretary of state to verify the eligibility of candidates.
Moore is on the record questioning Obama’s eligibility.
In an interview with WND in 2010, he defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin’s demand that President Obama prove his eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment orders.
Moore said he had seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a natural-born citizen and much evidence that suggests he is not.
Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty.”
“And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said.
‘Affirmative duty’
Klayman asserts the secretary of state “has an affirmative duty that stems from her oath of office under both the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions, to protect the citizens from fraud and other misconduct by candidates.”
As a result of her refusal to investigate the qualifications of candidates for president, Klayman says, “a person believed to be unqualified for that office has been elected.”
The remedy, he said, “is to require each candidate to do what every teenager is required to do to get a learner’s permit.”
“It is to produce a bona fide birth certificate … and the Secretary of State is the official to cause that to happen.”
McInnish is a member of the Madison County Republican Executive Committee and also sits on the state Republican Executive Committee.
Citing the investigation of Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, Klayman says Chapman “gained knowledge from an official source that there was probable cause to believe the Barack Obama had not met a certifying qualification.”
The appeal brief notes McInnish visited the secretary of state’s office Feb. 2, 2012, and spoke with the deputy secretary of state, Emily Thompson, in Chapman’s absence.
Thompson, the brief says, “represented that her office would not investigate the legitimacy of any candidate, thus violating her duties under the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions.”
As WND reported, Arpaio and his team concluded that Obama’s long-form birth certificate was a computer-generated forgery.
Klayman, in a previous brief, argued the secretary of state, “having the power to certify candidates, can surely de-certify – in effect disqualify – them if they are found to be ineligible.”
In his new appeal, Klayman points, as an example, to California Secretary of State Debra Bowen’s rejection of Petra Lindsay on the 2012 California primary ballot because she was 27 years old. The U.S. Constitution requires the president to be at least 35.
In his conclusion, Klayman argues the fact that the election is over does not make the case moot.
“It would be paradoxical beyond measure if the real and grave question of the legitimacy of the de facto President, a question which lies at the very heart of our American Constitutional Government, were left unresolved for want of the simplest of documents, a birth certificate.”
If either a bona fide birth certificate is produced or an admission is made that it does not exist, he writes, “this most important of legal questions will have been answered, the purity of Alabama’s ballot maintained, and the anxiety of Alabama citizens stilled.”
If the issue is not resolved, he said, citizens will be left with the impression “that their government was dysfunctional and has ignored their real concerns.
‘Certain documentation’
In an earlier step in the case one year ago, before a panel of Alabama Supreme Court justices, one justice raised doubts about Obama’s eligibility.
The justices denied a petition filed by McInnish seeking to require Obama submit an original birth certificate before he could be placed on the state’s 2012 ballot.
Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” were legitimate cause for concern.
“Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
The “certain documentation” is the findings of Arpaio’s investigation.
“The Alabama Constitution implies that this court is without jurisdiction over McInnish’s original petition,” Parker explained. “The office of the secretary of state of Alabama is not a ‘court of inferior jurisdiction’ that this court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a petition.”
Now, however, the case is coming from a lower court.
‘Obama violated the Constitution’
Moore told WND in an interview after his election last November that the country must return to a standard in which the rule of law prevails over politics.
He said Obama violated the Constitution when he bombed Libya, because the Constitution stipulates only Congress shall declare war.
“No president has the power to violate constitutional restraints of power,” Moore said.
“The Constitution is the rule of law, and [my job is] to uphold the rule of law.”
Government’s job, Moore said, is to secure and protect those rights.
“There is little regard for the Constitution in the courts today, even the U.S. Supreme Court.”
Related articles
- Will Alabama Supreme Court Rule Obama Ineligible? (theobamahustle.wordpress.com)
- Judge Roy Moore To Preside Over Obama Eligibility Case (godfatherpolitics.com)
Administration faces question: Are donors paying for Obama access?
By Rachel Rose Hartman, Yahoo News
White House spokesman Jay Carney on Monday answered growing questions about whether big donors to President Barack Obama’s nonprofit Organizing for America (OFA) are being promised access to the president.
His answer? Well, kind of.
While Carney had responded “no” when Fox News’ Ed Henry asked if a recent report “suggests that access to the president is being sold,” his explanation sidestepped the issue. He offered instead a string of policy proposals, definitions and a recitation of campaign finance rules.
On Friday, New York Times reporter Nicholas Confessore wrote of an alleged pay-for-access arrangement through OFA: “Giving or raising $500,000 or more puts donors on a national advisory board for Mr. Obama’s group and the privilege of attending quarterly meetings with the president, along with other meetings at the White House.”
On Monday, Carney emphasized that the group, which was born out of the president’s campaign committee, is an “independent organization”; that administration officials follow rules regarding separation between outside groups and the administration; and that the president supports campaign finance transparency.
When pressed again to explain the reports, Carney referred questions to OFA.
Related articles
- Carney Ducks Questions about Access to President Being Sold (nationalreview.com)
- Jay Carney dodges questions about buying a meeting with Obama (redalertpolitics.com)
- OFA Donors Who Give $500,000 Get Quarterly Meetings with Obama (thelibertybeacon.com)
- Are donors paying for access to Obama? (cbsnews.com)
- Are donors paying for access to Obama? (cbsnews.com)
- Jay Carney Struggles To Deny $500,000 OFA Donation Gets You Access To The President (buzzfeed.com)
- White House defends donor access to Obama (firstread.nbcnews.com)
- Chicago-style “Pay to Play” emerges in DC with OFA (illinoisreview.typepad.com)
Breaking News – US Supreme Court To Hear Case Against Obama Fraud In A Closed Door Hearing Away From The Main Stream Media Spotlight
Breaking News – US Supreme Court To Hear Case Against Obama Fraud In A Closed Door Hearing Away From The Main Stream Media Spotlight
OBAMA TRIAL 15 FEB 2013 IN US SUPREME COURT–OVER OBAMA USING FAKE ID–FAKE SOC SEC NUMBER 042-68-4425–FAKE DRAFT CARD WITH FAKE POSTAL STAMP.–JUSTICE ROBERTS PUT THE OBAMA TRIAL BEHIND CLOSED DOORS–TREASONOUS–CONGRESS OPEN THE OBAMA TRIAL TO THE PUBLIC NOW.
Orly Taitz, friend of The Obama Hustle will have her case against the protected one on the 15th of this month. In a hearing behind closed doors which is unheard of as far as I can tell, Taitz will have her day with the Justices. She will be using information supplied by the Obama Hustle detailing the frauds committed by Barack Obama along with other evidence supplied by experts and others across the spectrum of various expertise.
She will be using evidence supplied by my article:
http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2013/01/23/breaking-news-obama-caught-using-stolen-social-security-number/ which details Obama’s crime in detail and finally connected the dots on his crime against the American people with the theft of the social security number that he stole from Harry Bounel, a man from Russia born in 1890.
Like her or not, people have to respect Orly’s tenacity in digging for the truth and shedding light on the protected one and his many crimes such as:
- A fraudulent and forged Birth Certificate
- Stolen social security number
- Real Estate fraud
- Tax fraud
- High Crimes and against the American people
- Election fraud
- A forged Selective Service document
- Aliases
- 2006 US Senate Ethics violations
Other articles written by the Hustle that prove Obama’s fraudulent / criminal activities:
This article clearly details how in 2006 Obama committed a US Senate Ethics violation by not disclosing a $104,500.00 reale state transaction that was a separate business transaction from his supposed real property, ie his home in IL. http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2011/08/17/obama-caught-lying-on-his-2006-u-s-senate-financial-disclosure-report/
This article clearly lays out the crime committed by Obama and the social security fraud that he committed when he stole Harry Bounel’s social security number. http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/three-strikes-on-obamas-bogus-social-security-number/
This article clearly lays out in detail through a FOIA request from Cook County, IL which details Obama’s real estate fraud committed in 2005 when that house in Chicago was purchased for him to live in. http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2011/10/03/documents-recived-through-the-freedom-of-information-act-from-cook-county-treasurers-office-prove-fraud-in-obama-buffer-zone/
This article clearly details the many addresses that Obama used to commit his voter fraud in 2008. http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2011/05/24/report-iv-address-search-for-barack-obama-in-a-50-state-search/
This article clearly proves that Congress knows about the inconsistencies / fraud that surround Obama and how they are afraid to go after him for fear of being labeled as radicals by the MSM. http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/rep-posey-spokesman-media-ridicule-stopping-us-from-addressing-obamas-identity-fraud/?preview=true&preview_id=1016&preview_nonce=7de4ca725b
It is amazing how Congress and the MSM refuse to open the discussion on the so-called inconsistencies / fraud that surround this individual. In 2011 I performed a live database pull which was actually seen by the office of FL Congressman Bill Posey which clearly proved that Obama has an alias and that he is in fact using a stolen social security number which has now been proven to belong to an individual by the name of Harry Bounel as proven by a SSA FOIA received in November of 2012.
The US Congress and the MSM need to go after the criminal Obama and investigate him the way they did when Nixon was caught committing crimes within the Watergate investigation. Barack Obama is fraud who has lied to the American people and the MSM along with the US Congress are complicit in this deceit on the United States of America.
Related articles
- Aliases Obama allegedly used are Barry Soetoro, Harrison J. Bounel, entering Obama’s claimed Social Security number (042-68-4425) (charlesoliverblog.wordpress.com)
- Orly Taitz – Takes case against Obama to Supreme Court (usazorrozpress.wordpress.com)
- Breaking News! Chief District Judge to rule whether there will be a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining certification of Obama’s election (theobamahustle.wordpress.com)
- Breaking News! Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts Schedules a Case by Attorney Taitz Regarding Obama’s Forged Ids to Be Heard in Conference Before the Full Supreme Court (theobamahustle.wordpress.com)
- Supreme Court Conference Scheduled For Obama Forged ID’s (youviewed.com)
- PAPERS PLEASE: Supreme Court To Review Obama Forged Documents (secretsofthefed.com)
- Breaking News – Obama Caught Using Stolen Social Security Number (theobamahustle.wordpress.com)
- Birther News-CA Judge Reinstates Obama Eligibility Lawsuit: Identity Document Fraud & Election Fraud (themadjewess.com)
- Politics & NWO - Re: JUST IN- OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE (disclose.tv)
Judge Roy Moore “No convincing evidence that Obama is a natural born citizen”"
Judge Roy Moore sworn in,January 11, 2013, Ten Commandment judge returns, God and scripture references, No convincing evidence that Obama is a natural born citizen
“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense, to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells
“Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty,” Moore said. “And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful.”
Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.
“This is the strangest thing indeed. The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law,” he said.
“They can’t fool all of the people all of the time, and that’s what they’re trying to do,” he said.”…Judge Roy Moore interview by WND
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”… Marbury versus Madison
From AL.com January 11, 2013.
“Ten Commandment judge returns: Roy Moore sworn in as Alabama’s chief justice”
“In a ceremony heavy on references to God and scripture, Roy Moore took the oath of office today as chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court.
Moore was joined by many relatives and a number of classmates from the U.S. Military Academy in West Point, where he graduated in 1969.
An overflow crowd attended the investiture ceremony at the state judicial building to see Moore return to the office roughly nine years after he was removed for his refusal to follow a federal judge’s order to remove a Ten Commandments monument that Moore had placed in the state judicial building. Moore has said that order was wrong.
He did not mention the controversy during today’s speech. He did quote George Washington from an inaugural address on the subject of acknowledging God.
“It was right then to acknowledge God. And it will continue to be so,” Moore said. He also said the foundation of the judicial system was laid in Deuteronomy 1:16-17. “We’ve got to remember that most of what we do in court comes from some scripture or is backed by scripture,” Moore said. More than 100 people watched the ceremony from an overflow area on closed-circuit television.
Tommy Bryan, a member of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals since 2005, was sworn in as an associate Supreme Court justice.
Bryan was elected to fill the seat vacated by Justice Thomas Woodall, who retired.
Moore was sworn in Circuit Judge John Bentley from the state’s 25th Judicial Circuit, which includes Marion and Winston counties. Bentley attended West Point with Moore. Bentley introduced a number of other West Point graduates who came to Montgomery for Moore’s swearing in.
Justice Michael Bolin swore in Bryan, whom he called one of his best friends. C.O. Grinstead, pastor of Trinity Baptist Church in Oxford, drove to Montgomery to see Moore sworn in. He said Moore was a long-time friend.
“I’m thankful he ran and that is not a derogatory statement against the previous chief justice,” Grinstead said. “I just think the name Roy Moore is a statement in itself against crime and something for great morality.””
http://blog.al.com/montgomery/2013/01/ten_commandment_judge_returns.html
From WND September 20, 2010.
“Battle-scarred judge says Lakin decision ignores Constitution”
” The military judge who curiously noted without explanation that uncovering evidence about President Obama’s birth records could prove “embarrassing” and denied an officer the right to obtain potentially exculpatory evidence in a court-martial simply has forgotten the Constitution, the supreme rule of the United States.
So says Judge Roy Moore, who battled the politically correct climate as chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court a decade ago and ultimately was removed from office by a state panel that refused to review the constitutionality of a federal court order.
His comments came today in an interview with WND about Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who yesterday was denied permission by Army Col. Denise R. Lind to obtain evidence that could document Obama is not eligible to occupy the Oval Office.
Lakin refused to follow his latest deployment orders to go to Afghanistan, because he was unable through Army channels to document Obama’s eligibility, and the president himself has declined opportunities to do so.
Judge Moore, who now operates through the Foundation for Moral Law, has personal experience with challenging the powers that be to follow the Constitution. His dispute centered on a Ten Commandments display he put in a state building to recognize the God who inspired the Founders of America.
A federal judge opined that the monument shouldn’t be there and ordered its removal. Moore refused and ultimately was removed from office by a state commission that he says “blindly” followed the order without evaluating its legitimacy.
With her decision, Lind mirrored a number of federal judges who have ruled on civil lawsuits over Obama’s eligibility. They have without exception denied the plaintiffs’ access to any requested documentation regarding the president’s eligibility.
Lind ruled that it was “not relevant” for the military to be considering such claims, that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led up to the Pentagon, and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.
Moore said the ruling is a symptom of a judiciary across the nation that now believes in following “blindly.”
“The highest law in this country is not the order of the Supreme Court of the U.S., not the order of the commander in chief, or any subordinate officer,” he said.
Instead, it is the Constitution, which in this particular case demands that the president be a “natural born citizen,” a requirement not imposed on other officers.
There have been dozens of lawsuits and challenges over the fact that Obama’s eligibility never has been documented. The “Certification of Live Birth” his campaign posted online is a document that Hawaii has made available to those not born in the state.
“Lt. Col. Lakin has every right to question the lawfulness of the orders of the commander in chief. He’s not only the commander in chief, he dictates the whole war effort, as shown by the recent firing of [Gen. Stanley McChrystal],” Moore said.
It doesn’t matter, he said, that orders come from a colonel, or a general or even the Pentagon.
“The same thing applies in the military as in the judicial system,” he explained. “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, it’s not the order of a higher officer, not the order of a judge.”
Lind found that since Congress allocates money for the war effort and the Pentagon was created, an order tracing back to the military hierarchy should have been sufficient for Lakin.
“That’s wrong,” Moore said. “They’re not the commander in chief.
“No order in the military can be issued without the authority that backs the order. The president didn’t give the order, but he is the authority that backs the order,” he said.
With the current protocol to simply follow orders, Moore warned, the U.S. will develop more incidents like that involving Lt. William Calley in Vietnam. The atrocities of My Lai were carried out under the guise of “following orders,” Moore noted.
Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty,” Moore said. “And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful.”
Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.
“This is the strangest thing indeed. The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law,” he said.
“They can’t fool all of the people all of the time, and that’s what they’re trying to do,” he said.”
Related articles
- 2nd bite to challenge Obama’s eligibility? (wnd.com)
- Will Alabama Supreme Court Rule Obama Ineligible? (godfatherpolitics.com)
- Decalogue déjà vu? Alabama ‘Commandments Judge’ says legal system comes rrom Bible (secularnewsdaily.com)
BREAKING NEWS – Hawaii state registrar Alvin Onaka has publicly certified to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Barack Obama’s HI birth certificate is legally non-valid and the White House image is a forgery.
Forged Obama COLB
As reported to AL HENDERSHOT, Editor of The Obama Hustle.
Hawaii state registrar Alvin Onaka has publicly certified to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Barack Obama’s HI birth certificate is legally non-valid and the White House image is a forgery. He also confirmed to KS SOS Kris Kobach that the information contained in the White House image isNOT “identical to” that in the official record.
Many of you have replied to concerned constituents that the matter is settled by the public statements of Hawaii officials, the HDOH birth index list, the newspaper birth announcements, and Obama’s posted short-form and long-form birth certificates. Onaka’s disclosure – the only one made by a HI official under oath –negates all that and fits the vast legal and forensic evidence collected so far, some of which is in my affidavit (privately posted at for NE criminal case #B2-119. Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Commander, Mike Zullo (both of whom initially disbelieved the skeptics) have both signed affidavits saying there is legal-quality FORENSIC evidence that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and draft registration are forged. Onaka has now revealed the REASON for the forgery: to hide the non-validity of the birth record. Evidence in my affidavit proves (among other things) that the 1960-64 birth index includes non-valid records.
Onaka’s disclosure is proof of results-altering election fraud in every state in this country, since fraudulent filing documents were used to place Obama on every state’s ballot. Absent a non-Hawaii birth record, Obama doesn’t even have a legally-determined birth date, place, or parents so nobody can lawfully say he meets the age or citizenship requirements to be President – and yet every Certification of Nomination falsely swears that he is eligible. EVERY electoral vote for Obama is thus now LEGALLY KNOWN to be fraudulently-obtained and must not be certified as lawful on Jan 8th. As with the Sandusky case, those with knowledge have legal responsibility to act, and that is now you.
Even if the majority in Congress wrongly certifies the electoral vote, that only makes Obama the President-elect. The 20th Amendment says that if the President-elect fails to qualify by Jan 20th, the Vice-President-elect must “act as President”. Without any legally-determined birth date, birth place, or birth parents, there is no way that Barack Obama could have qualified by Jan 20, 2009 – or can qualify by Jan 20, 2013, unless his birth facts ARE legally determined. The biggest favor any one of you can do for this whole process (and for Obama himself if he is to become President LAWFULLY) is to file a lawsuit (with standing) challenging Obama’s eligibility so that the records will be presented as evidence to a JUDICIAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE person or body (not legislative, according to Hawaii statute 338-17, so Congress is powerless on this issue) and birth facts determined. That’s the only way Obama can “qualify” by Jan 20, 2013.
Our President has committed perjury 6 times by swearing (in AZ, NC, and WV) that he is eligible, knowing that he has no valid HI birth certificate (and claiming a Kenyan birth in his bio until 2007), and let his spokesmen pass off two forgeries as genuine on his behalf. He knowingly allowed a decorated military surgeon to lose his life’s savings and retirement and spend 6 months in prison for simply wanting to know if his combat orders were lawful, or whether they Constitutionally had to come from Joe Biden instead – who OPPOSED the “surge”.
It appears that many felonies have been committed. An impeachment must precede a criminal investigation and trial, so failure to impeach is obstruction of equal protection & the rule of law – without which, none of your life’s work even matters because the laws you make will only be enforced when politically expedient to the powerful. A banana republic.
Related articles
- 16 Civil Case Obama Challenges in Court (theobamahustle.wordpress.com)
- Hawaii officials fingered for ‘hiding’ Obama’s birth records (askmarion.wordpress.com)
- Cold Case Posse boss fingers Hawaii officials (wnd.com)
- Breaking News! Chief District Judge to rule whether there will be a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining certification of Obama’s election (theobamahustle.wordpress.com)
- Indiana: Obama Removed From Ballot? Birthers Final Chance On Monday 10/22/2012 (theobamahustle.wordpress.com)
- Supreme Court Halts Obama Election Certification (usazorrozpress.wordpress.com)
- Chief District Judge to Rule Whether There Will Be a Temporary Restraining Order Enjoining Certification of Obama’s Election by Congress… (usazorrozpress.wordpress.com)
- Petition On W.H. Website Asking For Obama’s Birth Certificate & His College & University Records (americanlivewire.com)
