The Obama Hustle

The Rediscovered Truth About Barack H Obama

Archive for the ‘U.S. Senate’ Category

BREAKING NEWS – Judge Hollander in Maryland gives Attorney Orly Taitz 21 days to file a second amended complaint and add allegations in regards to an improper withholding by the Social Security Administration of records of Harry Bounel, whose Social security number is being illegally used by Barack Obama.

with 9 comments


By AL HENDERSHOT – Editor: The Obama Hustle 12/16/2013

The soon to be six year-long investigation into the case against Barack H Obama and his use of a stolen social security number which belongs to a 120 year old deceased individual by the name of Harry Bounel has taken a new course today.  The information obtained was on a Mr. Harry Bounel who was born in Russia in 1890 and living in the Bronx, NY as of the 1940 Census.

227746_553443691333421_106082669_n

1940 Census listing Mr. Harry Bounel on line 48.

As per a November 16, 2012 FOIA noted below which clearly proves that the social security number, 042-68-4425 absconded by Obama does not belong to him but in fact belongs to Mr. Harry Bounel.

November 16, 2012 SSA FOIA requesting information on Harry Bounel using 042-68-4425 social security number and 1890 DOB

November 16, 2012 SSA FOIA requesting information on Harry Bounel using 042-68-4425 social security number and 1890 DOB

When the FOIA was requested it was done using the “SS-5” request form using the 120 year old rule which excludes privacy concerns for information requested for information on a deceased individual’s “SS-5” documentation who would over 120 years of age at time of request.  It was completed using the name of Harry Bounel, SSN 042-68-4425, and the DOB – 1890.

My previous article, “http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/?s=three+strikes” goes into great detail on how the evidence has mounted against Obama and his fraudulent activities concerning his absconded social security number.

The following excerpt is from www.orlytaitzesq.com

“Judge Hollander in Maryland gives Attorney Orly Taitz 21 days to file a second amended complaint and add allegations in regards to an improper withholding by the Social Security Administration of records   of Harry Bounel, whose Social security number is being illegally used by Barack Obama. When Taitz filed the complaint, SSA did not respond at all.

After the law suit was filed, SSA responded by fraudulently claiming that the records were not found. Taitz responded that this is a fraudulent assertion, since the records were found before and denied to another petitioner due to privacy concerns, however Social Security has no right to claim privacy as according to their own 120 year rule they have a duty to release the records.

The judge stated that the plaintiff Taitz might be correct, however at this time she cannot rule in her favor as her original complaint was filed before SSA responded, so the judge gave Taitz an opportunity to re-file a second amended complaint and add new allegations, stating the SSA responded but improperly hidden the records .

This is a great development. This all but assures that the judge will order the SSA to release the    SS-5, Social Security application of resident of CT, Harrison (Harry) Bounel, whose CT SSN 042-68-4425 was stolen by Obama and used in Obama’s 2009 tax returns, which initially were posted on WhiteHouse.gov without proper redaction, without flattening of the file .”

526508_598696400141483_1759622595_n

Each and every one of Obama’s relatives have all had social security numbers of their own even though they have all been documented as being in the United States illegally.

 

 

BREAKING NEWS – “Universe-shattering’ twist in Obama birth probe”

with 3 comments


By Bob Unruh WND

The lead investigator in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation of President Obama’s birth certificate says  the case has taken a startling turn, and sheriff’s investigators now are  assisting the Cold Case volunteers.

“When this information is finally exposed to the public, it will be  universe-shattering,” Mike Zullo told WND. “This is beyond the pale of anything  you can imagine.”

But the allegations, he said, which go far beyond a fraudulent birth  certificate, could be public as early as March.

The issue arose once again because of the death Wednesday in Hawaii of state Health  Department chief Loretta Fuddy in a plane crash. She was the official who waived state prohibitions and provided to the White House a copy of a document that Obama presented to the public as his birth certificate.

It’s the document that Arpaio’s investigators have concluded is  fraudulent.

Amid conspiracy theories circulating the Internet, Zullo told WND Friday that  Fuddy’s death – she was the only fatality among nine people aboard a small  airplane that crashed off the coast of Molokai – appears to be a tragic  accident, not foul play.

He said his investigation does not depend on any information from Fuddy.

In an interview today with author and talk-radio host Carl Gallups of  PPSimmons News and Ministry Network and the author of “The  Magic Man in the Sky,” and the new “The  Rabbi who Found Messiah,” Zullo said his investigation of the Obama  fraud case “does not hinge on Ms. Fuddy.”

“While her death certainly is a tragedy, it in no way hampers our  investigation in this matter,” he said. “If people truly believe that her  untimely demise was somehow related to an attempt to silence her for ‘what she  may or may not know,’ then there are several more people in Hawaii who should be  very, very concerned.

“Again, I want to emphasize,” Zullo said, “Sheriff Arpaio and I do not, at  this time, believe her death was connected to any nefarious circumstances.”

The birth certificate dispute dates back to before the 2008 election.  Critics, including Hillary Clinton, raised the issue about Obama’s status as a  “natural-born citizen.” Not defined in the Constitution, it probably was thought  at the time of the writing of the Constitution to be someone born of two citizen  parents.

Obama fails that test because his father was a Kenyan student visiting the  U.S.

Arpaio assigned his Cold Case Posse to look into the issue before the 2012  election, when constituents approached him and asked him to check whether Obama  would be an ineligible candidate on the presidential election ballot.

In a recent radio interview with Gallups, Zullo affirmed the investigation  had been expanded to the county sheriff’s office and was “moving in a direction  that was not anticipated by us.”

“The whole [issue] is more nefarious than you can imagine,” Zullo said,  crediting Arpaio for ordering the investigation and sticking with it.

“He knows in his gut that something is wrong,” Zullo said.

Dozens of lawsuits have been filed without success. One case is pending  before the Alabama Supreme Court for which Zullo provided evidence.

Read  all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth  Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the  subject.

See a report of Fuddy’s death:

Still a live issue

Zullo has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth  certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had  been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a  genuine paper document.

“Mr. Obama has, in fact, not offered any verifiable authoritative document of  any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of  his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event,” he explained.  “One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to  have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together  digitized data from several unknown sources.”

Zullo also has noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an  original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.

See some of Zullo’s evidence:

More recently, Grace  Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the  birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an  expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in  eligibility cases.

“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed  Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,”  Zullo told the World Tribune.

“Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the  news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very  firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used  Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and  called almost immediately.

“There is something wrong with this,” Hayes said.

Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations  and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a  scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured  document created by utilizing material from various sources.”

“In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never  seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my  opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,” he says in the  report.

Investigator  Douglas J. Hagmann of the Northeast Intelligence Network reported this month that in October an affidavit was filed in a court case, under seal, that  purportedly identifies the creator of the Obama birth certificate.

He said Douglas Vogt, an author and the owner and operator of a scanning  business who also has an accounting background, invested over two years in an  investigation of the authenticity of document.

Vogt, along with veteran typesetter Paul Ivey, conducted “exhaustive research  of the document provided to the White House Press Corps on April 27, 2011 – not  the online PDF, a critical distinction that must be understood,” Hagmann  said.

“Using their combined experience of 80 years in this realm, they conducted  extensive examinations of the ‘copy’ that was used as the basis for the PDF  document. They acquired the same type of equipment that was used back in the  late 1950s and early 1960s in an attempt to recreate the document presented as  an ‘authenticated copy’ proving the legitimacy of Barack Obama. Instead, they  found 20 points of forgery on that document and detail each point of forgery in  the affidavit,” wrote Hagmann.

“Even more interesting, Mr. Vogt claims to have identified the ‘signature’ of  the perpetrator, or the woman who created the forged document, hidden within the  document itself. Her identity, in addition to the identity of other conspirators  and their precise methods are contained in a sealed document supplementing the  public affidavit.”

Grounds for impeachment

Last  month, WND columnist Christopher Monckton wrote that the controversy he  calls “Hawaiigate” should be “the central ground of impeachment.”

“First, the dishonesty is shameless and in your face. Mr Obama’s advisers,  once they realized the ‘birth certificate’ was as bogus as a $3 bill, knew that  if they simply went on pretending that $3 bills are legal tender the  hard-left-dominated news media would carefully and continuously look the other  way, pausing occasionally to sneer at anyone who pointed out that, in this  constitutionally crucial respect, the ‘president’ has no clothes,” Monckton  wrote.

“Secondly, not one of the numerous agencies of state, as well as federal  government, whose duty was and is to investigate the Mickey-Mouse ‘birth certificate’  has bothered even to respond to the thousands of requests for investigation put  forward by U.S. citizens.

He said that in Hawaii last year, he watched “as a senior former state  senator called the police and, when they came, handed over to them compelling  evidence that the ‘birth certificate’ had been forged.”

“The police, correctly, passed the file to the state’s attorney general, a  ‘Democrat,’ who did nothing about it,” he said.

“In Washington, D.C., I watched as a concerned citizen from Texas telephoned  the FBI and reported the ‘birth certificate’ as being a forgery. They said they  would send two agents to see him within the hour. No one came.”

‘You tell me about eligibility’

One of the highest profile skeptics has  been billionaire Donald Trump.

Trump said he can’t be certain that Obama is eligible to be president, and he  pointedly noted that a reporter who was poking fun at the issue admitted he  can’t, either.

Trump repeatedly has insisted Obama has not documented his eligibility. At one point, he  offered $5 million to the charity or charities of Obama’s choice if he would  release his passport records and authorize the colleges he attended to release  his applications and other records.

Trump argues that those documents would show whether or not Obama ever  accepted scholarship or other aid as a foreign student, which could preclude him  from being a “natural-born citizen.”

Trump’s conversation with ABC’s Jonathan Karl started with Karl noting that  Trump took on the “not serious” issue of eligibility.

“Why does that make me not serious?” Trump demanded. “I think that resonated  with a lot of people.”

Karl replied: “You don’t still question he was born in the United States, do  you?”

“I have no idea,” Trump said. “I don’t know. Was there a birth certificate?  You tell me. You know some people say that was not his birth certificate. I’m  saying I don’t know. Nobody knows, and you don’t know either. Jonathan you’re a  smart guy, and you don’t know.”

When Karl admitted he was “pretty sure,” Trump jumped on the statement.

“You just said you’re pretty sure … you have to be 100 percent sure,” he  said. “Jonathan, you said you’re pretty convinced, so let’s just see what  happens over time.”

Read  all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth  Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the  subject.

Among the many records the Obama camp has refused to release are the marriage  license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change  records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of  his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism  records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial  aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law  School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with  Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state  senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.

Monckton, citing Zullo’s sworn  affidavit in a court case, published a sworn  mathematical analysis demonstrating the near-zero probability that the White  House “birth certificate” is genuine.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/universe-shattering-twist-in-obama-birth-probe/#Xq5PAbA0rz0Myrdw.99

GOP: Obama lied about health insurance law

with one comment


English: President Barack Obama's signature on...

 

Christian Science Monitor

 

By Brad Knickerbocker Staff writer / November 16, 2013

 

President Obama acknowledges that he was wrong when he said Americans could keep their existing health plans under the Affordable Care Act. He’s apologized, and he’s told insurance companies they should let people keep those plans for a year.

But has that mollified Republicans eager to kill Obamacare, either outright or by draining it of all meaning? No way. If anything, this perceived weakness has them sharpening their political rhetoric.

On Saturday, their designated attacker as much as said Obama lied when he repeatedly assured the public, “If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health-care plan, you will be able to keep your health-care plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what.”

Among the phrases used by Sen. Ron Johnson (R) of Wisconsin in the weekly GOP radio and Internet address: “phony…fraudulent…grand deception…false promises.”

“President Obama’s so-called apology was as phony as his fraudulent marketing of Obamacare,” Sen. Johnson said.

“Those assurances weren’t slight exaggerations or innocent shadings of the truth. They were statements that were fully vetted, coldly calculated, and carefully crafted to deceptively sell your health care plan to a trusting public,” Johnson charged. “It was a political fraud echoed relentlessly by House and Senate Democrats who should be held accountable for the disastrous consequences of their grand deception.”

Consumer fraud this massive in the private sector could – and should – bear serious legal ramifications,” he said. “For President Obama, however, it helped secure enough votes to pass Obamacare, and win reelection.”

Whether or not Obama knew early on that some people would be kicked off their health insurance policies may never be known. There’s no smoking gun – no secret Oval Office tape – so far.

But large numbers of Americans – already fed up with the HealthCare.gov debacle – are not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Asked whether Obama “knowingly deceived the public when he said that if people liked their health insurance plans they would be able to keep them under the 2010 health care law,” 46 percent of respondents in the latest Quinnipiac University National Poll say “yes,” including 17 percent of Democrats and 51 percent of independents. (Forty-seven percent say “no.”)

A new Fox News poll came up with similar results: half of those surveyed believe the president knowingly lied when he made the notorious “you can keep it” pledge, nearly 60 percent believe the administration knew ahead of time that people would have their health insurance policies canceled because of the law, and 55 percent think the White House has “tried to deceive” people about it.

With midterm elections around the corner, Republicans are stalking political prey – especially any Democratic incumbents who voted for Obamacare. And they’re using Obama’s “grand deception,” as Sen. Johnson put it Saturday, in politically predatory fashion.

“There’s nothing more damaging than when your word is devalued and people think they were misled,” Rep. Greg Walden, (R) of Oregon, who heads the National Republican Congressional Committee, the House GOP‘s campaign arm, told the Associated Press. “And especially damaging is when it actually affects you and your family. So in terms of degree of impact, this is off the Richter scale.”

For his part, Obama might have been expected to talk about the Affordable Care Act in his radio and Internet address Saturday.

But at this point, it’s actions instead of words that will be judged. And to dwell on it in this venue – apologizing some more, promising that things will get better with HealthCare.gov – would look like he’s trapped in one issue.

In his address, Obama talked about energy policy.

“Just this week, we learned that for the first time in nearly two decades, the United States of America now produces more of our own oil here at home than we buy from other countries,” he said. “That’s a big deal. That’s a tremendous step towards American energy independence.”

 

 

 

BREAKING NEWS Social Security administration is due to release on Monday Social Security number application for SSN 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel which Obama is fraudulently using

with 2 comments


English: Social Security Administration Office...

Press release, Social Security administration is due to release on Monday Social Security number application for SSN 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel  which Obama is fraudulently using

Law Offices of Orly Ttaitz

For 5 years now Attorney Orly Taitz has pursued the issue of Obama ‘s use of fabricated IDs. the most damning evidence against Obama is his use of Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 , which failed E-Verify and SSNVS and which was traced to Harry Bounel, born in 1890.

Currently there are 7 challenges to Obama brought by Attorney Taitz, two of them are cases specifically dealing with this issue. The cases are slightly different. The latest motion  before Judge Lamberth in DC is based on Obama’s failed E-Verify and his number, which was traced to Bounel. The second case, which was  filed in MD, where SSN administration is located, is filed based on Bounel’s name  and the same Social Security number and the fact that the regime wrongfully denied access to his application, claiming privacy, even though he was born over 120 years ago and privacy no longer applies based on 120 year rule.

Taitz filed a motion for summary judgment. Rod Rosenstein, US attorney for MD, asked presiding judge, Ellen L. Hollander, for more time to respond to a 2 page motion, claiming that 2 weeks were not enough. She granted the request the same day, before the plaintiff could even see the motion to extend time. Shortly thereafter the war or possible war with Syria broke. Now there is a peace agreement, no further distractions, the response id due on Monday and regime ran out of excuses.

Yesterday the regime sent a trial balloon. It published in a couple of blogs (at least one of these blogs is believed to be controlled by the regime)  something to the extent that maybe by a typographical error the information of Bounel and Obama got crossed in one database. They were quoting a researcher Susan Daniels stating that the information about Bounel found by Albert Hendershot  was a one time thing found by one researcher, one error in one database. A number of people, who might be connected to the regime as well, sent Taitz this article to make sure Taitz saw the trial balloon to ascertain  if this latest story would fly.

The answer, it will not fly.

Incidently,  researcher Albert Hendershot was visited by the FBI. When he refused to cooperate, he was tackled, thrown on the ground and handcuffed. At that time he was asked for password for his computers. His computers were taken and in fear of being thrown to jail he gave the password. Hendershot published an article about his experience and published the receipts given to him by the FBI for his computers.  This matter was not litigated yet.

Further on, Attorney Taitz did not submit to court Hendershot’s findings until she had confirmation. Originally, when Taitz talked to investigator Susan Daniels, the investigator said that she could not find Bounel’s information and Taitz did not submit Hendershot’s findings to several courts, including administrative court in GA, where Daniels testified for Taitz.  Later, in a phone conversation Daniels confirmed to Taitz that she found Bounel ‘s information as well. Only when Taitz had this confirmation from a second source, from Daniels, did she submit it to court. Daniels and Hendershot used different databases. Only after Daniels confirmed to Taitz that she found Bounel’s infomation, Taitz contacted Hendershot and related to him that his findings were confirmed by Daniels and he wrote a second article about it.

If need be, Taitz will provide proof of all of the above.

At this point Obama is cornered. He is using a stolen Social Security number and proven computer generated forgeries instead of valid IDs.

This might be related or not, but Dan Pfeifer, Obama strategist, who together with Perkins-Coie attorney, Bob Bauer,presented to the public on April 27, 2011  the forgery of the Obama’s birth certificate, was yesterday taken to the hospital with the stroke like symptoms.

The response is due on Monday, right after Yom Kipur, the Jewish day of atonement. We’ll see what U.S. attorney Rod Rosenstein and  Federal Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander will do.

More information on this and other cases can be found on OrlyTaitzESQ.com.

BREAKING NEWS – The dam bursts on Benghazi

with 6 comments


By Paul Brandus | The Week

Thanks to a bombshell report from ABC News, GOP accusations that the White House politicized a tragedy no longer seem so unsubstantiated

For a long time, the Republican hunt for the truth surrounding the Benghazi terror attack has reminded me of one of President Reagan‘s favorite jokes. It concerns a little boy whose parents worried he was too optimistic. So they took him to a psychiatrist. Trying to dampen his spirits, the doctor led the boy into a room piled high with horse manure. The boy unexpectedly squealed with delight and began digging through it. “What on earth are you doing?” the psychiatrist asked.
“With all this manure,” the boy replied, “there must be a pony in here somewhere.”
And so it is with Benghazi. Republicans, convinced that the American people are being hoodwinked by the Obama administration, have been digging through the doo-doo for eight months. There must be a conspiracy and cover-up in here somewhere, they think. There must be.
The White House has scoffed at this witch hunt for months. But this week, it’s looking like they’re the ones standing in the doo-doo — playing politics, it seems, with tragedy.
The administration has long maintained that the now-infamous talking points used by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice on five Sunday talk shows just days after the September 11 attack were the product of the intelligence community. We know the talking points originated in the intelligence community. But the final product itself? No.

ABC News reports that the documents were heavily edited by the State Department. And not just edited, but censored: State requested that references to Ansar al-Sharia — tied to al Qaeda — be deleted. It also requested that references to CIA warnings about terror threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack be deleted as well. (Read the whole ABC story here.)

Rewind to November 28. Here’s what White House press secretary Jay Carney told us at that day’s press briefing:

Those talking points originated from the intelligence community (IC). They reflect the IC’s best assessments of what they thought had happened. The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment (emphasis added) that was made to those talking points by either of those two institutions were changing the word ‘consulate’ to ‘diplomatic facility’ because ‘consulate’ was inaccurate.

And Carney just two days ago stuck to this story, telling us: 

The only edits made by anyone here at the White House were stylistic and nonsubstantive. They corrected the description of the building or the facility in Benghazi from consulate to diplomatic facility and the like. And ultimately, this all has been discussed and reviewed and provided in enormous levels of detail by the administration to congressional investigators, and the attempt to politicize the talking points, again, is part of an effort to, you know, chase after what isn’t the substance here.

Carney’s phrase “here at the White House” may be accurate in the physical sense, but in the broader context there’s no question he was referring to the Obama administration at large. And as Stephen Hayes of The Weekly Standard — which first published some of the email traffic between the White House and State Department on this — charged, “senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what happened.”

So who at the State Department was involved in changing — and censoring — the talking points? According to one email, spokesperson Victoria Nuland — who reported to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — expressed specific concern about this particular CIA talking point:

The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa’ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya. These noted that, since April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British Ambassador’s convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks. [Via ABC News]

Is there a White House connection? ABC notes that in a Sept. 14 email — two days before Rice went on TV — Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes said the State Department’s concerns needed to be addressed.
“We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department,” Rhodes noted.
The final talking points eventually given to Rice reflected State’s concerns, but Carney told us that it’s all on the up-and-up because the changes were signed off on by the CIA.

There’s a meatpacking-like quality to all this. You don’t really want to know how your hamburger is processed, do you? The administration’s defense — and it’s looking thinner than ice on a late spring pond — is that government bureaucracy is messy and multi-layered and that’s a big part of why Rice said what she did.
Benghazi occurred seven weeks before election day. The administration’s strategy was simple: Downplay the terror attack, change the narrative, and run out the clock. And that’s what it did.

But now the dam has burst. Carney’s “here at the White House” comment has essentially thrown Clinton under the bus. Republicans, who leaked the edited emails to Karl and Hayes, have succeeded on two fronts: They’ve got the administration on the defensive over Benghazi, and they’ve weakened the Democrat’s most formidable 2016 candidate.

It seems that after all that digging, Republicans have found their pony at last.

BREAKING NEWS – FBI Detaining People Connected To Obama Investigations

with 17 comments


By AL HENDERSHOT – Editor of The Obama Hustle – 04/17/2013

On April 10, 2013 the FBI showed up at my front door.  When I answered the door they told me who they were and that they wanted to speak to me about activities with / about the exposed website that was posting information about Muller, Holder, and Obama.

http://web.archive.org/web/20130314220223/http://exposed.su/

Well, obviously, I have nothing to hide so I gave them my computer.  I was also handcuffed while they were talking to me.

Two days later I get a phone call from the FBI telling me that I am not in trouble and that I have nothing to worry about in connection to my activities with others and what I am writing about in my blog www.theobamahustle.wordpress.com  On the 12th I go by the FBI office with a witness, just in case, to pick up my property and again they tell me, “that I am not in trouble and that I have nothing to worry about in connection to my activities with others and what I am writing about in my blog”.

When they were at my house they, the FBI secured my personal information as well such as my SSN and other personal information.  I have no doubt they investigated me out thoroughly and also investigated at what my activities have been in connection to the Obama fraud evidence and others as well.

Later on in the day I received some phone calls from people that I have been working with on the Obama issue.   They, the people that I spoke with said that my activities with the “Cold Case Posse” and my postings on Obama in The Obama Hustle along with the evidence that I have collected on him and his family probably had something to do with my visit from the FBI.

I have not heard of any others being visited by the Feds as it pertains to the exposed website.  In my discussions on Friday we came to the conclusion that this is very interesting in that there must be some people that are worried over what information might be available against the anointed and protected one from his lies being exposed.

I will not be deterred.  I will not be harassed.  I am not afraid.  I will give my life for my country and for what I believe in.  “FREEDOM”.

We are in a fight for our nation from an individual and others who want to destroy the United States of America and transform this great nation into a melting pot and Socialistic paradise for radicals and illegal aliens so they can stay in power.

GOD Bless America and those patriots in this fight against the evil ones that want to enslave us, kill GOD, and kill our babies.

IMG_0003IMG_0001IMG

BREAKING NEWS – US Troops Plotted To Kill Obama, Developing Story Indicates

with one comment


Ludowici, GA — Four US troops plotted to kill President Obama, going so far  as to kill another two people who were aware of the plot in a story for which  only scant details have been provided for thus far.

Armed with $87,000 worth of weapons, the troops that plotted to kill Obama  were said to have been planning a large set of terrorist activities, including  assassinating the President as well as bombing major targets and overthrowing  the federal government.

Pfc. Michael Burnett pled guilty today to manslaughter as well as  gang-related activity in the December killings of former soldier Michael Roark  and Roark’s girlfriend, 17-year-old Tiffany York. In the case against Burnett,  Roark and York were referred to as “loose ends,” killed because of their  knowledge of the assassination plot.

Ludowici, GA — Four US troops plotted to kill President Obama, going so far  as to kill another two people who were aware of the plot in a story for which  only scant details have been provided for thus far.

Armed with $87,000 worth of weapons, the troops that plotted to kill Obama  were said to have been planning a large set of terrorist activities, including  assassinating the President as well as bombing major targets and overthrowing  the federal government.

Pfc. Michael Burnett pled guilty today to manslaughter as well as  gang-related activity in the December killings of former soldier Michael Roark  and Roark’s girlfriend, 17-year-old Tiffany York. In the case against Burnett,  Roark and York were referred to as “loose ends,” killed because of their  knowledge of the assassination plot.

The initial report on the plot to kill Obama by the US troops refers to an “anarchist militia within the U.S. military with plans to overthrow the federal  government,” and details what we know so far, disclosed earlier today:

“Prosecutor Isabel Pauley says the group bought $87,000 worth of guns and  bomb-making materials and plotted to take over Fort Stewart, bomb targets in  nearby Savannah and Washington state, as well as assassinate the  president.”

Little else is known about the alleged plot to kill Obama, and the names of  the other soldiers thought to be involved in the treasonous plans were not  disclosed in the initial report. For instance, it is not known if Roark is one  of the four accused of planning to kill the president, or if the plot involved  others.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/313590/us-troops-plotted-to-kill-obama-developing-story-indicates/#QB4trDxTEbjJ0vUg.99

The initial report on the plot to kill Obama by the US troops refers to an “anarchist militia within the U.S. military with plans to overthrow the federal  government,” and details what we know so far, disclosed earlier today:

“Prosecutor Isabel Pauley says the group bought $87,000 worth of guns and  bomb-making materials and plotted to take over Fort Stewart, bomb targets in  nearby Savannah and Washington state, as well as assassinate the  president.”

Little else is known about the alleged plot to kill Obama, and the names of  the other soldiers thought to be involved in the treasonous plans were not  disclosed in the initial report. For instance, it is not known if Roark is one  of the four accused of planning to kill the president, or if the plot involved  others.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/313590/us-troops-plotted-to-kill-obama-developing-story-indicates/#QB4trDxTEbjJ0vUg.99

Written by The Obama Hustle

April 15, 2013 at 6:08 pm

Cry and Howl

Cease, my son, to hear the instruction that causeth to err from the words of knowledge. Proverbs 19:27

YouViewed/Editorial

News , Blues and Guns ... Not Necessarily In That Order

For What It's Worth

Greenwich, Connecticut real estate, politics, etc.

Today's News 4 You

Just another WordPress.com site

Mississippi Coal

Kemper Lignite Coal Plant Connections to the United Nations' Projects

The Piratearian

Aye, It's good to be a Pirate!

Texas Tudors's Blog

Frederick and Tudor Genealogy

The Ohio Conservative

Conservative thought and opinion from the Midwest

The Surf Report

Triangulating "Truth" in a Troubled Paradise

theconservativehillbilly

Confronting stupid people with the cold hard conservative fist of truth

Hump Day Report

It's America...We Can Get Over The Hump!

My Very Own Point of View

bits and pieces of what runs through my mind

The Daley Gator

If you are LEFT, you just ain't RIGHT

Socialism is not the Answer

Limited Government Is

2012: What's the 'real' truth?

To find out, I hold a finger in the breeze.

Sparkleplenty27's Campaign Coverage

Political News About the Campaign FACT BASED and Commentary

Old1wordpress's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Real News World Wide

News World Wide, Real News Worldwide, News World Wide, Verified News, Infowars.com, realnewsworldwide.com, world news, headline news, best news

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,983 other followers

%d bloggers like this: