The Obama Hustle

The Rediscovered Truth About Barack H Obama


with 13 comments


This is the long form birth certificate showin...

This is the forged long form birth certificate showing that the supposed 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born at 7:24 pm, on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii, United States.

DAMAGE CONTROL: A recent ballot challenge hearing in New Jersey exposes a desperate strategy by Obama to distance himself from his forged certificate and induce the contrived value of his transient political popularity as the only “legitimate qualification” needed to hold the office of the presidency. By Dan Crosby of THE DAILY PEN

NEW YORK, NY – After a Maricopa County law enforcement agency conducted a six-month forensic examination which determined that the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth posted to a government website in April, 2011 is a digital fabrication and that it did not originate from a genuine paper document, arguments from an Obama eligibility lawyer during a recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing reveals the image was not only a fabrication, but that it was likely part of a contrived plot by counterfeiters to endow Obama with mere political support while simultaneously making the image intentionally appear absurd and, therefore, invalid as evidence toward proving Obama’s ineligibility in a court of law.
Taking an audacious and shocking angle against the constitutional eligibility mandate, Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.
Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate.  At the hearing, attorney for the plaintiffs, Mario Apuzzo, correctly argued that Obama, under the Constitution, has to be a “natural born Citizen” and that he has not met his burden of showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by showing that he is indeed a “natural born Citizen.”
He argued that Obama has shown no authenticate evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State demonstrating who he is and that he was born in the United States. Apuzzo also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.
As Obama’s legal argument becomes more contorted, he is being forced to avoid an ever shrinking legal space, and an increasing weight, of his failure to meet constitutional eligibility requirements.  Hill, of Genova, Burn & Giantomasi Attorneys in Newark, made a desperate motion to dismiss the ballot objection arguing that Obama’s lack of natural-born citizenship status was not relevant to being placed on the New Jersey presidential ballot because no law exists in New Jersey which says that a candidate’s appearance on the ballot must be supported by evidence of natural born citizenship status. Only the U.S. constitution restricts eligibility to hold the office of president to natural born citizens.
Judge Masin denied the motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.
“Sadly, regardless of her moral deficiency, Hill is legally justified,” says TDP Editor, Penbrook Johannson, “Obama’s eligibility is a separate matter than the charges of forgery and fraud. Of course, we have evidence that he is not eligible. But, evidence of forgery by as yet unidentified counterfeiters working on behalf of Obama is not what legally excludes Obama from appearing on a ballot, by itself, until some authority is willing to consider this as evidence of forgery on its merit as an indication of actual ineligibility in a court of legal authority. Until some court of competent jurisdiction is willing to hear evidence of forgery and fraud, you can’t legally punish a political candidate for that crime which has not been proven that they committed. However, since Obama is not eligible because of a lack of authenticated evidence to the contrary, he could be held off the ballot for that reason.”
According to Johannson, there is an overwhelming level of moral certainty that Obama is a usurper, but until a court with jurisdiction considers this case, Obama’s status as a legitimate president is in limbo.
“He does not exist as a president except in the imagination of those who blindly support him. Whereas he is politically desired by a transient consensus, his legality is unresolved until a responsible court makes a determination. This is the essence of our crisis. Our nation exists in a state of non-authorized identity. Obama is just some guy calling himself a president and living in the White House without the confirmative authority to do so.”
Obama’s document forgery and fraudulent presidency have now forced him to flee to a “strange twilight zone” between political popularity and legal legitimacy where poorly counterfeited records are apparently allowed to be published by Obama using government media resources for political purposes, yet those same records are held by the courts as irrelevant for determining Obama’s legal eligibility status because they are, according to judges, “so poorly forged” they are obviously meant to be satirical and not to be taken seriously as evidence.
Shockingly, parting from widespread public ignorance, Hill actually acknowledged two of the three necessary components of determining natural born citizenship as being place of birth and citizenship status of both parents. However, she argued that, “No law in New Jersey obligated him (Obama) to produce any such evidence in order to get on the primary ballot.”
The third component of natural born eligibility is maintenance of natural born citizenship status from birth to election without interruption, involuntarily or voluntarily, due to expatriation, extradition, renouncement or foreign adoption.
“Obama is mocking our constitution,” says Johannson, “His position is that he never claimed the image was an indication of his natural born status, just that it was information about his birth. Whether it is forged or authentic is irrelevant to Obama because plausible deniability affords him the security in knowing that no legal authority is willing to hang him with it.”
Of course, Johannson adds that it makes Obama look like a willing accomplice and a liar, but, he says, “…show me a politician who cares about being seen as a liar by the public. If people who support him want to vote for a person like that, it reveals more about the reprobate character of Obama supporters than competency of any legal determination about his lack of constitutional eligibility. Degenerates will vote for a degenerate while patriots will exhaust all civil means to remove him…until those civil means are exhausted. Then things get ugly for government.”
“However, Hill is also essentially admitting that Obama is not a legitimate president and that Obama believes that his illegitimacy does not matter to his legal ability to hold the office. Obama holds to a political tenet, not a legal one with respect to his views on his eligibility. That’s what corrupt, criminal politicians do. When the law convicts them, they run to public favorability for shelter with the hope that their supporters will apply pressure to disregard law in their case.”
Obama is now arguing that because he is politically popular, as he points to as being indicated by his so-called ‘election’, despite accusations of eligibility fraud and election fraud, the constitutional eligibility mandate is not relevant, in his view. Until a courageous authority is willing to disagree and hold Obama to an equally weighted legal standard, civil remedies for the Obama problem are limited.
Johannson adds that Obama is making the same argument on behalf of Obamacare.  “If he had the gall to actually tell the Supreme Court that they have no authority to determine the unconstitutionality of his illegitimate policies, what makes anyone think he believes they have the authority to disqualify him due to his lack of constitutional eligibility? Obama believes he holds preeminent power over all branches of government because of his delusions of political grandeur.”
He correctly points to a lifetime pattern of behavior and testimony by Obama which indicates a complete lack of regard for the U.S. Constitution when it restricts Obama’s political agenda and lust for power.
“This is a guy who illegally defaced public property when he scribed his aspirations to be ‘king’ in a concrete sidewalk at the age of ten, for God’s sake. Now, his ‘majesty’ wants to put his illegal ‘graffiti’ into American law books. However, his problem is that he has to face the fact that he is an abject failure in his capacity to meet any standard required by the 250-year-old U.S. Constitution, in everything he tries to do. The Constitution owns him and he can’t stand it. He hates it. Therefore, instead of admitting his lack of constitutionality, he simply breaks the rules and proceeds to illegally scribe his fake authority on everything until someone is willing to physically stop him. Obama is not just an illegitimate politician, he is a rogue outlaw without regard for the divine providence of American law.”
Apuzzo submitted that New Jersey law requires Obama to show evidence that he is qualified for the office he wishes to occupy and that includes showing that he is a “natural born Citizen,” which includes presenting evidence of who he is, where he was born, and that he was born to two U.S. citizen parents. Apuzzo added that the Secretary of State has a constitutional obligation not to place any ineligible candidates on the election ballot.
The account of the trial can be read at:

13 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery But Disregards “Image” As Indication of Obama’s Inelig… ( […]

  2. Excellent post!


    April 14, 2012 at 2:01 pm

  3. Our Military swore to uphold our Constitution and protect US from all enemies both foreign and domestic!
    Arrest him now! Now go the our House and Senate and arrest every man and woman that has not stood up and denounced this impostor! They built the FEMA Camps to hold US Patriots! Fill them with these criminal Communists! TODAY!


    April 14, 2012 at 2:14 pm

  4. […] of the hearing itself.  The first article is by Dan Crosby of the Daily Pen and reproduced over at The Obama Hustle. Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery But Disregards “Image” As Indication Of Obama’s […]

  5. […] of the hearing itself.  The first article is by Dan Crosby of the Daily Pen and reproduced over at The Obama Hustle. Obama Lawyer Adits Forgery But Disregards “Image” As Indication Of Obama’s […]

  6. Web Search “Obama the love child”

    Michael F Rivero

    April 15, 2012 at 11:06 am

  7. […] background-color:#222222; background-repeat : no-repeat; } – Today, 10:38 […]

  8. […] Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery But Disregards “Image” As Indication of Obama’s Inelig… ( […]

  9. […] Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery But Disregards “Image” As Indication of Obama’s Inelig… ( […]

  10. […] of the hearing itself.  The first article is by Dan Crosby of the Daily Pen and reproduced over at The Obama Hustle. Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery But Disregards “Image” As Indication Of Obama’s […]

  11. […] the hearing itself.  The first article is by Dan Crosby of the Daily Pen and reproduced over at The Obama Hustle. Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery But Disregards “Image” As Indication Of Obama’s […]

  12. Hill is right, in a way.
    The document trotted out by Obama as his original birth certificate on 27 April 2011 is irrelevant, because it’s not his original birth certificate. It’s a partial picture of his amended birth certificate, required in adoptions.
    But the original birth certificate, showing two U.S. citizen parents, would prove that Obama was constitutionally eligible at the time of his birth. Obama withholds his original birth certificate because it would prove that the black Luo tribesman Barack Hussein Obama was not his birth father.
    Apuzzo is right, but irrelevant. He’s right in saying that a natural born citizen under Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution must have two U.S. citizen parents when born in the U.S.A. He is irrelevant in that Obama had two U.S. citizen parents when he was born in the U.S.A.
    Obama’s real eligibility problem is that in 1981 he voluntarily relinquished U.S. citizenship, to evade a male U.S. citizen’s obligation to register with Selective Service, by ratifying and confirming, as an adult, his juvenile naturalization as a citizen of Indonesia. In 2008 Obama caused to be filed a back-dated Selective Service registration to fabricate evidence that he retained U.S. citizenship in 1981, by fraudulently doing, belatedly, the very thing that he spurned American citizenship to dodge.
    It would be fitting to find that Obama is ineligible for evading an obligation of U.S. citizenship, not from an accident of birth. Like the story of the man without a country, he would get what he deserves for rejecting the United States.
    Chief election officers of the several states should demand exhaustive official investigation of Obama to confirm his eligibility at birth and his loss of eligibility by relinquishing U.S. citizenship in 1981.
    If American officials with jurisdiction to conduct such an investigation, including Congress, state legislatures, grand juries, attorneys general and prosecutors continue to fail in their responsibilities, the election officials themselves should bar Obama from their respective ballots unless and until his original birth certificate is published and sufficient evidence is produced to resolve grave doubts as to his American citizenship arising from his naturalization as a citizen of Indonesia.
    Everybody should submit demands to this effect to all state chief election officials, copies to their corresponding attorneys general, found at and General. The initial draft of my aide-memoire to the election officials follows. Anybody who joins in this effort will do America a good service.
    20 April 2012
    Aide-Memoire to American Chief Election Officials
    There is insufficient publicly available information to prove or disprove the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama II (“Obama”). Hence election officials are unable to make a rational determination whether to bar him or allow him onto their respective ballots. Absent competent evidence to substantiate eligibility, he should be barred from the electoral ballot.
    His original birth certificate verifies that Obama was constitutionally eligible at birth. Until the original is disclosed, however, his eligibility at birth is unverified, and he should be barred from the electoral ballot.
    Obama in 1981 confirmed as an adult his juvenile Indonesian naturalization. He did this in part to relinquish his American citizenship and thereby evade Selective Service registration. In 2008, a backdated registration was slipped into Selective Service files, to falsify timely compliance. Unless grave doubts about Obama’s American citizenship are resolved by exhaustive investigation and factual disclosure, his eligibility is unverified, and he should be barred from the electoral ballot.
    If election officials admit a candidate of unverified eligibility to their respective ballots, they may be fairly criticized in a performance audit of their office, might fail of re-appointment or re-election, and could be impeached and removed from office and criminally prosecuted. Moreover, election or re-election of an ineligible candidate renders the laws uncertain, and causes permanent injury to the nation.
    Hence election officials should join in a demand for exhaustive investigation of Obama, preferably by Congress but also by many other officials with jurisdiction, including state legislatures, grand juries, attorneys general and prosecutors, to give them the facts by which they can make rational, fully informed decisions on Obama’s eligibility without serious risk to themselves or the nation.

    Albert Moore

    April 20, 2012 at 9:35 pm

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Cry and Howl

Let not him that girdeth on his harness boast himself as he that putteth it off. I Kings 20:11


News , Blues and Guns ... Not Necessarily In That Order

For What It's Worth

Greenwich, Connecticut real estate, politics, etc.

Today's News 4 You

Just another site

Mississippi Coal

Kemper Lignite Coal Plant Connections to the United Nations' Projects

The Piratearian

Aye, It's good to be a Pirate!

Texas Tudors' Blog

Tudor and Frederick Ancestors


News & Commentary

The Ohio Conservative

Conservative thought and opinion from the Midwest


Confronting stupid people with the cold hard conservative fist of truth

Hump Day Report

It's America...We Can Get Over The Hump!

My Very Own Point of View

bits and pieces of what runs through my mind

The Daley Gator

If You're Left, You Just Ain't Right

Socialism is not the Answer

Limited Government Is

2012: What's the 'real' truth?

To find out, I hold a finger in the breeze.

Sparkleplenty27's Campaign Coverage

Political News About the Campaign FACT BASED and Commentary

Old1wordpress's Blog

Just another weblog

Telling it like it is since 19....month

%d bloggers like this: