The Obama Hustle

The Rediscovered Truth About Barack H Obama

BREAKING NEWS – Obama eligibility appeal in Alabama Supreme Court Judge Roy Moore’s court

with 16 comments


English: Great Seal of The State of Alabama

Many cases challenging Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have come and  gone, but now an appeal has been filed with a state Supreme Court led by a newly  elected chief justice who has expressed doubt about Obama’s qualification for  office.

Roy Moore was elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court last  November, a decade after he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments  monument from the state Supreme Court building.

Now, 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama  Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish are asking the state’s highest court to  force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the  state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.

Get Judge  Roy Moore’s classic book about his battle for liberty, “So Help Me God: The Ten  Commandments, Judicial Tyranny, and the Battle for Religious  Freedom.”

Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of the Washington, D.C.-watch dog Judicial  Watch and now head of Freedom  Watch, filed the appeal Tuesday with the Alabama Supreme Court, asking for  oral arguments.

“We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the  Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law,” Klayman told WND.

Klayman says he and his team “have great respect for Chief Justice Moore and  his integrity and legal acumen.”

“He is one courageous and brave man. There are few in this country.”

The case is an appeal of a dismissal by the Montgomery Circuit Court.

In his brief, Klayman says “credible evidence and information from an  official source” was presented to Chapman before the election indicating Obama  might not have been qualified for Oval Office.

The complaint argues Chapman failed her constitutional duty as secretary of  state to verify the eligibility of candidates.

Moore is on the record questioning Obama’s eligibility.

In an interview with WND in  2010, he defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin’s demand that President Obama prove  his eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment  orders.

Moore said he had seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a natural-born  citizen and much evidence that suggests he is not.

Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions  under the Constitution, he has a duty.”

“And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in  violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said.

‘Affirmative duty’

Klayman asserts the secretary of state “has an affirmative duty that stems  from her oath of office under both the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions, to  protect the citizens from fraud and other misconduct by candidates.”

As a result of her refusal to investigate the qualifications of candidates  for president, Klayman says, “a person believed to be unqualified for that  office has been elected.”

The remedy, he said, “is to require each candidate to do what every teenager  is required to do to get a learner’s permit.”

“It is to produce a bona fide birth certificate … and the Secretary of State  is the official to cause that to happen.”

McInnish is a member of the Madison County Republican Executive Committee and  also sits on the state Republican Executive Committee.

Citing the investigation of Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold  Case Posse, Klayman says Chapman “gained knowledge from an official source that  there was probable cause to believe the Barack Obama had not met a certifying  qualification.”

The appeal brief notes McInnish visited the secretary of state’s office Feb.  2, 2012, and spoke with the deputy secretary of state, Emily Thompson, in  Chapman’s absence.

Thompson, the brief says, “represented that her office would not investigate  the legitimacy of any candidate, thus violating her duties under the U.S. and  Alabama Constitutions.”

As WND  reported, Arpaio and his team concluded that Obama’s long-form birth  certificate was a computer-generated forgery.

Klayman, in a previous brief, argued the secretary of state, “having the  power to certify candidates, can surely de-certify – in effect disqualify – them  if they are found to be ineligible.”

In his new appeal, Klayman points, as an example, to California Secretary of  State Debra Bowen’s rejection of Petra Lindsay on the 2012 California primary  ballot because she was 27 years old. The U.S. Constitution requires the  president to be at least 35.

In his conclusion, Klayman argues the fact that the election is over does not  make the case moot.

“It would be paradoxical beyond measure if the real and grave question of the  legitimacy of the de facto President, a question which lies at the very heart of  our American Constitutional Government, were left unresolved for want of the  simplest of documents, a birth certificate.”

If either a bona fide birth certificate is produced or an admission is made  that it does not exist, he writes, “this most important of legal questions will  have been answered, the purity of Alabama’s ballot maintained, and the anxiety  of Alabama citizens stilled.”

If the issue is not resolved, he said, citizens will be left with the  impression “that their government was dysfunctional and has ignored their real  concerns.

‘Certain documentation’

In an earlier step in the case one year ago, before a panel of Alabama  Supreme Court justices, one justice raised doubts about Obama’s eligibility.

The justices denied a  petition filed by McInnish seeking to require Obama submit an original birth  certificate before he could be placed on the state’s 2012 ballot.

Justice Tom Parker filed a  special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish’s charges  of “forgery” were legitimate cause for concern.

“Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which,  if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary  presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein  Obama that have been made public.”

The “certain documentation” is the findings of Arpaio’s investigation.

“The Alabama Constitution implies that this court is without jurisdiction  over McInnish’s original petition,” Parker explained. “The office of the  secretary of state of Alabama is not a ‘court of inferior jurisdiction’ that  this court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a  petition.”

Now, however, the case is coming from a lower court.

‘Obama violated the Constitution’

Moore told  WND in an interview after his election last November that the country must  return to a standard in which the rule of law prevails over politics.

He said Obama violated the Constitution when he bombed Libya, because the  Constitution stipulates only Congress shall declare war.

“No president has the power to violate constitutional restraints of power,” Moore said.

“The Constitution is the rule of law, and [my job is] to uphold the rule of  law.”

Government’s job, Moore said, is to secure and protect those rights.

“There is little regard for the Constitution in the courts today, even the  U.S. Supreme Court.”

 

16 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. PRESERVE THIS PLANET

    The walls of Jericho fell down by the power of God. Correct? Joshua had to EXACTLY follow God’s instructions. Joshua heard the voice of God, and so do I. Valiant.  Joshua obeyed the Father and CREATOR OF HEAVEN AND EARTH. ***EXPLICITLY, ABOSOLUTLY, FOR SUCH A MIGHTY WORK/MISSION.  So also we the targets of North Korea can and will destroy before we are destroyed.   God instructed Joshua to use sound and praise to take the walls down. The whole nation of North Korea is in a mind maze. If all the Holy people of god gathered in the same way all over the world, where ever they are, I believe god would destroy this egotistical ruler, and those that are in the maze with him. Thru the perception of Scientific and military techniques this can be done only with our creator as the Horn would we succeed and preserve life on this planet.   We need to create a sound wave (like an E.M.T. blast, but not because it would not be nuclear and no warheads) the same metals to be used are as in the Ark of the Covenant. CONELRAD, radio waves, telephone, Wi-Fi; as hackers have already cracked code in China, so we do with North Korea. It is done with weather by chemicals and biological warfare. The sound would be like notes in a song (music in definition and also the types of musical instruments used to create the sound) but amplified in a modern way, because of the distance and directed it to particular co-ordinance and surround the area destined for destruction. We cannot leave God out or he will also destroy us. A vortex of sorts would be created and contained by reverse. However we must work together or not at all. To miss use this information and turn it on the American people or any other Nation without direction from Jesus the living King, I perceive that He will destroy the planet and all it’s inhabitants. And He has said he will remove the few sent to assist and start again.   I can visualize satellites in the heavens being used, strategically placed, as well as ground satellite towers possibly, on trains, trucks, and even boats. Possibly using water as a conduit? Using reflectors, repeaters, whatever bounces or relays the sound waves you know the details and specific terms of technology and I do not. I have a perception of the song or facsimile to be used but is yet to be singled down. EBS could be used for Mass alert to signal the singers and instruments as it should be live so as decrease technological error. Perhaps the robot locusts can be directed into North Korea for inside relay station points (basket balls or type to create concealment). The volume measured according to distance and level of concealment for specific target. Even animals for the random interruption of distraction for the confusion of North Korean Military. You do the Math. I have more information in my mind’s eye, but writing it makes it hard to convey.   On a personal note: I received this ‘inspiration or transmission from our Creator thru prayer about a month or so ago’ and was immediately thrust into personal family chaos and persecutions and distractions, coupled with other activity that I am working in my own frontlines.  My phone and internet have been compromised, and new unrest comes to my attention just now. I am confident in my Yahweh Jesus Christ and His allotment of mercy and wrath. However, I have no confidence in mankind. On thoughts of Humanitarian issues, this is just the beginning of the piles of tares to be destroyed. North Korea’s leader is elevated by the people’s choice; it is in their blood, DNA, they are one of the seeds of the adversary—-their passion is force and bloodshed.   Should you choose to ignore my caution, exclude me from the planning and delivery of this informative Method of Self defense, I do perceive that it will be to your shame and demise from Above. I am not afraid of death, but failure to deliver this information I too would be ashamed and accountable to the Creator, my God of Salvation. I am not afraid of death, and it may come violently to me, but I will be going—once I pass thru that doorway—to be with Jesus Christ.    Many have said in the last few days; “We choose democracy” and “My will my way” “My lies my reality” So be it. You choose. I choose life in Jesus Christ for without Him I am nothing. If I were you; I would do this plan and prove the Truth of the matter. First of all I would pray in the most holy of all names: JESUS CHRIST.

    ________________________________

    Karlee Miles

    April 5, 2013 at 1:02 am

    • smrstrauss –

      I see that you are going to every “bither” site you can find to spread your propaganda. Why are you so concerned if birthers are those (supposed) “carnival barker” “conspiracy theorists?” Your over-kill is telling!

      Nathan M. Bickel

      April 12, 2013 at 11:53 am

  2. I read your NR article smrstrauss… You know, the birth certificate is not necessary to prove Obama’s in-eligibility. We Constitution minded Americans concurred relatively quickly that Obama is ineligible because his papa is a Kenyan and a Brit subject… not a natural born citizen. The birthers continue to belong to the Hillary camp and has been successful in diverting the actual truth as it has fostered this fraud.

    • You are wrong on the two-parent idea too. The meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law and refers to the place of birth.

      “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

      And here are two of TEN appeals court rulings, all of which held that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen was defined by the Wong Kim Ark case, and none of which said that the Minor v. Happersett case was relevant, and all of which ruled that birth in the USA is sufficient to make someone a Natural Born Citizen regardless of the citizenship of the parents (except for the children of foreign diplomats):

      Allen v. Obama (Arizona 2012) ruling: “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co. , 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. … Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise”

      Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling: “Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency…”

      And, on October 1 of last year, the US Supreme Court turned down an appeal of one of TEN appeals court rulings, all of which had ruled that EVERY child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born US Citizen. The effect of the US Supreme Court turning down the appeal is that the ruling of the lower court, and the other nine courts that had ruled the same thing STANDS.

      BTW, the meaning of Natural Born Citizen certainly did not come from Vattel, whose French word “indignes” was not translated into “Natural Born Citizen” until ten years after the Constitution was written and who was not even mentioned once in the Federalist Papers. And the evidence of the AMERICAN writers (Vattel was Swiss) at the time is that they always used the phrase Natural Born Citizen the way that it was used in the common law and never used it to refer to parents. Some examples:

      “Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. …St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

      “Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity.”—William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

      Both written by men who knew the writers of the US Constitution. And, a search of the writings of John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Ben Franklin and others at the time shows that they used the term Natural Born just the way that it was used in the common law several times, and that they never used it to refer to parents AT ALL.

      smrstrauss

      April 6, 2013 at 4:13 am

  3. re: smrstrauss
    here’s the bottom line..as of now your president has not furnished any proof of a 100% verifiable ‘valid’ identification , i.e birth certificate. The document presented on the White House web page, which they say was received directly from the registrar in Hawaii, has been shown and proven to be a photo shop forgery. Mr Alvin Onaka, the Hawaii state registrar, has publicly certified to Mr. Ken Bennet, the Arizona Sec of State that Obamas Hawaii birth cert is ‘legally non valid” and the White House image is a forgery. He further confirmed the the white house image ‘ IS NOT IDENTICAL TO” that in the offical record. Additionally his SSN, which was originally issued to another individual will not pass a simple E-verify test. We all know a SSN is issued once and only once. The man has spent millions of dollars in an attempt to hide or otherwise keep his school records closed , and for what reason? So it really matters not whether you or some private individual or organization may not believe the documents are fake. The proof is that they have been shown be forgery and until he can prove otherwise he is guilty of using false and forged documents to obtain the office of president which is a felony .

    Mike Dyer

    April 17, 2013 at 8:52 pm

    • Re: “Mr Alvin Onaka, the Hawaii state registrar, has publicly certified to Mr. Ken Bennet, the Arizona Sec of State that Obamas Hawaii birth cert is ‘legally non valid” and the White House image is a forgery.”

      Answer: That is a simple LIE, one of many, very many birther lies. Onaka never said any such thing. He has repeatedly said, as have other Hawaiian officials of BOTH parties that Hawaii sent valid short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that the facts on the image of the long-form birth certificate that the White House published are EXACTLY the same, that they match, the facts on the birth certificate that they sent to Obama.

      Obama’s birth certificate is not forged. Only birther “experts” have called it forged, and they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

      One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

      Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

      And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

      Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

      Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

      John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

      Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

      Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

      Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

      And it is irrational (to say the least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii. (Oh, and the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.)

      The reason that Obama’s SSN will not pass E-verify, is, duh, that when his SS number was published, he cancelled it and got a new one. And CT SSN was caused by a data entry error, of which there are MILLIONS upon millions in the SS system. Who ever told you that SS clerks were infallible in entering data?

      smrstrauss

      April 18, 2013 at 8:39 am

      • Further to birther LIES:

        One of the most recent lies was a birther site saying that Hawaii Registrar of Births Onaka had told the secretary of state of Arizona that Obama that the birth certificate was forged. But Onaka never said any such thing.

        And the birther sites said that Obama’s lawyer had admitted that Obama’s birth certificate was forged. But, again, she never said any such thing.

        And in the early days of the birther movement they manufactured the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya, when the tape shows that in fact she said that he was born IN HAWAII repeatedly.

        It is mainly because of such lies and because of the lies of birthers who claim to have shown that Obama birth certificate was forged (they are hardly impartial, and their claims have been crushed by real experts)——-that the birther movement has continued.

        And also there are the forged videos claiming that Obama said that he was born in Kenya, and the forged “Kenyan birth certificates”. And Obama’s selective service card was indeed forged; it was forged by the guy who posted it—who was not Obama, nor was it a representative of Obama.

        Then there are the claims that because Obama’s publicist made a mistake and failed to correct it, that means something. It only means that she made a mistake.

        Obama really was born in Kapiolani Hospital, as his birth certificate says, and that has been confirmed repeatedly by the officials of both parties in Hawaii, and Hawaii is thousands of miles from the nearest foreign country. And Obama’s relatives did not have the money, nor were they stupid enough to spend it, sending their pregnant daughter on a risky and highly expensive trip to a foreign country——–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

        smrstrauss

        April 18, 2013 at 8:45 am

    • Re: “The document presented on the White House web page, which they say was received directly from the registrar in Hawaii, has been shown and proven to be a photo shop forgery. ”

      Answer: No it hasn’t. Only birther “experts” have claimed it, and they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial.

      Re: “Mr Alvin Onaka, the Hawaii state registrar, has publicly certified to Mr. Ken Bennet, the Arizona Sec of State that Obamas Hawaii birth cert is ‘legally non valid” and the White House image is a forgery.”

      Answer: He never said any such thing. This is another in a long series of birther LIES. Neither Onaka nor Bennett said that Obama’s birth certificate is “legally non vaid” or that the White House image is a forgery. In fact, just the reverse, the officials in Hawaii including Onaka and several Republican officials have repeatedly confirmed the facts on Obama’s birth certificate.

      The reason that it did not pass the E-verify test was, duh, that when your SS number is published, it is a good thing to cancel it and get another one. The birthers who “tested” used the old SSN, but they do not know the new one. And the CT SS number was caused by one of millions of typographical errors caused by SS Administration clerks. Who told you that they were infallible??

      smrstrauss

      April 18, 2013 at 1:03 pm

      • Further to the claim of forgery:

        Obama’s birth certificate is not forged. Only birther “experts” have called it forged, and they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

        One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

        Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

        And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

        Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

        Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

        John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

        Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

        Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

        Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

        And it is irrational (to say the least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii. (Oh, and the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.)

        smrstrauss

        April 18, 2013 at 1:06 pm

  4. […] BREAKING NEWS – Obama eligibility appeal in Alabama Supreme Court Judge Roy Moore’s cour…. […]

  5. […] is genuine again. It’s difficult to find much reporting on the case outside of some of the crazier corners of the internet because, quite frankly, the only thing newsworthy is that people are still […]


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Cry and Howl

Let not him that girdeth on his harness boast himself as he that putteth it off. I Kings 20:11

YouViewed/Editorial

News , Blues and Guns ... Not Necessarily In That Order

For What It's Worth

Greenwich, Connecticut real estate, politics, etc.

Today's News 4 You

Just another WordPress.com site

Mississippi Coal

Kemper Lignite Coal Plant Connections to the United Nations' Projects

The Piratearian

Aye, It's good to be a Pirate!

Texas Tudors's Blog

Our Ancestors

The Surf Report

“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't.” - Mark Twain

The Ohio Conservative

Conservative thought and opinion from the Midwest

theconservativehillbilly

Confronting stupid people with the cold hard conservative fist of truth

Hump Day Report

It's America...We Can Get Over The Hump!

My Very Own Point of View

bits and pieces of what runs through my mind

The Daley Gator

If You're Left, You Just Ain't Right

Socialism is not the Answer

Limited Government Is

2012: What's the 'real' truth?

To find out, I hold a finger in the breeze.

Sparkleplenty27's Campaign Coverage

Political News About the Campaign FACT BASED and Commentary

Old1wordpress's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Real News World Wide

News World Wide, Real News Worldwide, News World Wide, Verified News, Infowars.com, realnewsworldwide.com, world news, headline news, best news

%d bloggers like this: