The Obama Hustle

The Rediscovered Truth About Barack H Obama

Obama’s birth certificate documentation now publicly declared a forgery by the legal Sheriff Arpaio Investigation

with 14 comments

The investigation into Obama’s show cased birth certificate is complete. The “Sheriff Arpaio Cold Case Posse” has not only found that Obama’s long form birth certificate is a forgery, but is the same investigation that has now publicly declared the felony [fraud] forgery.

This past recent Friday, the Arpaio chief detective investigator, Mike Zullo went on national radio airwaves as the highlighted guest of Pastor Carl Gallups “Freedom Friday” talk show host program. There, Zullo fielded questions from callers and made it clear that after a 15 month legal investigation by the Arpaio Cold Case Team that allegations (of forgery) over Obama’s purported legal and legitimate birth certificate were, indeed genuine.

The legal implication of the Obama forged long form birth certificate

It wasn’t too long ago that our White House occupier, Barack Hussein Obama hauled out this forged birth certificate to quell questions about his legitimacy and to quell…

View original post 963 more words


Written by The Obama Hustle

April 9, 2013 at 2:36 am

Posted in Uncategorized

14 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Absolutely astounding with all the facts of Obama’s ineligibility how this could ever happen???…especially a second term, He also has a fraudulent social security, plus so much more…he is a EVIL man who’s intent is to destroy America.Folks, we have an illegal alien for our president!!!!

    Patricia Toney

    April 9, 2013 at 11:06 am

  2. WHY is this imposter still in the White House??. Don’t we have ANY Officials who can do their job properly??
    WHO was / is protecting the PEOPLE of America?
    Where are they NOW!??


    April 9, 2013 at 11:58 am

    • He is still in the White House because he really was born in Hawaii, as his birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, and the public Index Data file and the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers that were sent to the Hawaii papers by the Hawaii DOH in 1961 all show. And because the meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law and refers to the PLACE of birth.

      “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]


      April 13, 2013 at 5:22 pm

  3. Re: Sheriff Joe:

    Only birther “experts”—who have not proven that they are really experts, and who certainly have not shown that they are fair and impartial—have claimed that there is something wrong with Obama’s birth certificate. That is two reasons why Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, the National Review and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona do not believe them, and it is why Rush Limbaugh and Fox news will not even discuss it. Why not? Because they would simply be discussing allegations made by a group of people who hate Obama.

    No one has ever seen Bush’s birth certificate or Clinton’s or Reagan’s. Obama has published images of the birth certificates and shown the physical copies (with the seal on the back, which one reporter stated that she had felt) to the press.

    AND Hawaii has stated that it sent the birth certificates to Obama, and the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have confirmed that there is a birth certificate on file and that the facts on it match those on the birth certificate in the files, and there were birth notices sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961.

    Obama’s mother lived in Hawaii. Obama’s father was studying in Hawaii. There is not a shred of evidence that either of them went from Hawaii to any other country in 1961—and certainly not to Kenya, where the Kenyan government said that it checked on the “born in Kenya” claim and found that it was false. Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and pregnant women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days, and yet you and other birthers apparently think that there could be a chance that Obama was born outside of the USA and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii, and the Index Data, and the birth notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961—-are all lying about that fact.


    April 9, 2013 at 4:22 pm

  4. men red bottom shoes…

    You need to invest some time in carrying out research to compare prices in order to seek best deals….

    men red bottom shoes

    April 17, 2013 at 12:57 pm

  5. THOMAS JEFFERSON to J.Cartwright 1824:

    “It(Our Revolution)….presented us an album on which we were free to write what we pleased. We had no occasion to search into musty records, to hunt up royal parchments, or to investigate the laws and institutions of a semi-barbarous ancestry. We appealed to those(laws) of nature…”

    Tom Bo

    April 19, 2013 at 7:12 am

  6. MANUAL of THE CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA By Timothy Farrar (1867)



    § 104.

    “…That, in the middle of the third generation after the adoption of such a Constitution by the American people , there should have existed in their midst four millions of people, partly OF THEIR OWN POSTERITY, mostly NATURAL BORN CITIZENS of the United States, AND universally RESIDENT INHABITANTS of the land, subject to its government and entitled to its protection

    Tom Bo

    April 19, 2013 at 7:13 am

  7. Speaker of the House of Representatives, Langdon Cheves,February 1814:

    We observe.. that children have a natural attachment & right to enter into the society of which their fathers were members..being obliged to acknowledge the protection it has granted them But every man born free, the son of a citizen, arrived at years of discretion, may examine whether it be convenient for him to join in the society for which he was destined by his birth.

    Tom Bo

    April 19, 2013 at 7:15 am

    • Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999)(children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):

      “Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.”


      Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983)(child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):

      “Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time.*** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.”


      Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122 (M.D. Ala. 1974)(child born in US to two Biafra citizens described as “natural born citizen” of the US):

      “The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States.”


      Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling:“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”

      And ditto:

      Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling : “It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”

      And this:

      Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling:“Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency…”

      And this:

      Farrar (et al.) v. Obama (Georgia 2012) ruling: “In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this court. [Ankeny] v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). … The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive.”

      (And there were a total of TEN appeals court cases, all of which ruled that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen was defined in the Wong Kim Ark case, and not one of which ruled that it was defined by the Minor v. Happersett case, and every one of which said that the term refers to the PLACE of birth, and not one of which said that the term refers to parents.)

      And here are the words of the US Supreme Court in the Wong Kim Ark case:

      “It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.

      III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established.”

      They all say that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law (“by the law of England for the last three centuries”) and refers to the place of birth, and that every child born in the USA is a Natural Born Citizen.

      On October 1, 2012 the US Supreme Court turned down two birther appeals of one of the ten appeals court rulings, the Georgia ruling, Farrar, which had ruled that “children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.” By rejecting the appeal, the US Supreme Court allowed the ruling of the lower court—and the other nine courts—to STAND.

      For those who would like to do their own research on the subject, here are some links:


      April 19, 2013 at 1:17 pm

      • Read the US Constitution. I do not care what some liberal judge has to say as they interperate it for their judicial justice for immigrants.

        The Obama Hustle

        April 19, 2013 at 5:00 pm

      • Re: “Read the US Constitution. I do not care what some liberal judge has to say as they interperate it for their judicial justice for immigrants.”

        Answer: I agree. READ the US Constitution. You will see that there is not a word in it about parents. It does require a Natural Born Citizen to be president. So, what does Natural Born mean? The answer is that the term comes from the common law (not from Vattel) and it refers to the PLACE of birth, not to the parents of a US-born citizen. If the writers of the US Constitution had meant Natural Born Citizen to refer to parents, they would surely have told us—and they didn’t and in NONE of the writings of the writers of the original Constitution did even one of them ever use the term Natural Born Citizen to refer to parents.


        April 21, 2013 at 8:12 am

  8. […] Obama’s birth certificate documentation now publicly declared a forgery by the legal Sheriff A… ( […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Cry and Howl

Let not him that girdeth on his harness boast himself as he that putteth it off. I Kings 20:11


News , Blues and Guns ... Not Necessarily In That Order

For What It's Worth

Greenwich, Connecticut real estate, politics, etc.

Today's News 4 You

Just another site

Mississippi Coal

Kemper Lignite Coal Plant Connections to the United Nations' Projects

The Piratearian

Aye, It's good to be a Pirate!

Texas Tudors' Blog

Tudor and Frederick Ancestors

The Ohio Conservative

Conservative thought and opinion from the Midwest


Confronting stupid people with the cold hard conservative fist of truth

Hump Day Report

It's America...We Can Get Over The Hump!

My Very Own Point of View

bits and pieces of what runs through my mind

The Daley Gator

If You're Left, You Just Ain't Right

Socialism is not the Answer

Limited Government Is

2012: What's the 'real' truth?

To find out, I hold a finger in the breeze.

Sparkleplenty27's Campaign Coverage

Political News About the Campaign FACT BASED and Commentary

Old1wordpress's Blog

Just another weblog

Real News World Wide

News World Wide, Real News Worldwide, News World Wide, Verified News,,, world news, headline news, best news

%d bloggers like this: