The Obama Hustle

The Rediscovered Truth About Barack H Obama

Archive for the ‘Health Insurance Reform Bill’ Category

BREAKING NEWS – “Universe-shattering’ twist in Obama birth probe”

with 3 comments


By Bob Unruh WND

The lead investigator in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation of President Obama’s birth certificate says  the case has taken a startling turn, and sheriff’s investigators now are  assisting the Cold Case volunteers.

“When this information is finally exposed to the public, it will be  universe-shattering,” Mike Zullo told WND. “This is beyond the pale of anything  you can imagine.”

But the allegations, he said, which go far beyond a fraudulent birth  certificate, could be public as early as March.

The issue arose once again because of the death Wednesday in Hawaii of state Health  Department chief Loretta Fuddy in a plane crash. She was the official who waived state prohibitions and provided to the White House a copy of a document that Obama presented to the public as his birth certificate.

It’s the document that Arpaio’s investigators have concluded is  fraudulent.

Amid conspiracy theories circulating the Internet, Zullo told WND Friday that  Fuddy’s death – she was the only fatality among nine people aboard a small  airplane that crashed off the coast of Molokai – appears to be a tragic  accident, not foul play.

He said his investigation does not depend on any information from Fuddy.

In an interview today with author and talk-radio host Carl Gallups of  PPSimmons News and Ministry Network and the author of “The  Magic Man in the Sky,” and the new “The  Rabbi who Found Messiah,” Zullo said his investigation of the Obama  fraud case “does not hinge on Ms. Fuddy.”

“While her death certainly is a tragedy, it in no way hampers our  investigation in this matter,” he said. “If people truly believe that her  untimely demise was somehow related to an attempt to silence her for ‘what she  may or may not know,’ then there are several more people in Hawaii who should be  very, very concerned.

“Again, I want to emphasize,” Zullo said, “Sheriff Arpaio and I do not, at  this time, believe her death was connected to any nefarious circumstances.”

The birth certificate dispute dates back to before the 2008 election.  Critics, including Hillary Clinton, raised the issue about Obama’s status as a  “natural-born citizen.” Not defined in the Constitution, it probably was thought  at the time of the writing of the Constitution to be someone born of two citizen  parents.

Obama fails that test because his father was a Kenyan student visiting the  U.S.

Arpaio assigned his Cold Case Posse to look into the issue before the 2012  election, when constituents approached him and asked him to check whether Obama  would be an ineligible candidate on the presidential election ballot.

In a recent radio interview with Gallups, Zullo affirmed the investigation  had been expanded to the county sheriff’s office and was “moving in a direction  that was not anticipated by us.”

“The whole [issue] is more nefarious than you can imagine,” Zullo said,  crediting Arpaio for ordering the investigation and sticking with it.

“He knows in his gut that something is wrong,” Zullo said.

Dozens of lawsuits have been filed without success. One case is pending  before the Alabama Supreme Court for which Zullo provided evidence.

Read  all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth  Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the  subject.

See a report of Fuddy’s death:

Still a live issue

Zullo has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth  certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had  been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a  genuine paper document.

“Mr. Obama has, in fact, not offered any verifiable authoritative document of  any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of  his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event,” he explained.  “One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to  have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together  digitized data from several unknown sources.”

Zullo also has noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an  original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.

See some of Zullo’s evidence:

More recently, Grace  Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the  birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an  expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in  eligibility cases.

“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed  Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,”  Zullo told the World Tribune.

“Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the  news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very  firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used  Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and  called almost immediately.

“There is something wrong with this,” Hayes said.

Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations  and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a  scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured  document created by utilizing material from various sources.”

“In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never  seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my  opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,” he says in the  report.

Investigator  Douglas J. Hagmann of the Northeast Intelligence Network reported this month that in October an affidavit was filed in a court case, under seal, that  purportedly identifies the creator of the Obama birth certificate.

He said Douglas Vogt, an author and the owner and operator of a scanning  business who also has an accounting background, invested over two years in an  investigation of the authenticity of document.

Vogt, along with veteran typesetter Paul Ivey, conducted “exhaustive research  of the document provided to the White House Press Corps on April 27, 2011 – not  the online PDF, a critical distinction that must be understood,” Hagmann  said.

“Using their combined experience of 80 years in this realm, they conducted  extensive examinations of the ‘copy’ that was used as the basis for the PDF  document. They acquired the same type of equipment that was used back in the  late 1950s and early 1960s in an attempt to recreate the document presented as  an ‘authenticated copy’ proving the legitimacy of Barack Obama. Instead, they  found 20 points of forgery on that document and detail each point of forgery in  the affidavit,” wrote Hagmann.

“Even more interesting, Mr. Vogt claims to have identified the ‘signature’ of  the perpetrator, or the woman who created the forged document, hidden within the  document itself. Her identity, in addition to the identity of other conspirators  and their precise methods are contained in a sealed document supplementing the  public affidavit.”

Grounds for impeachment

Last  month, WND columnist Christopher Monckton wrote that the controversy he  calls “Hawaiigate” should be “the central ground of impeachment.”

“First, the dishonesty is shameless and in your face. Mr Obama’s advisers,  once they realized the ‘birth certificate’ was as bogus as a $3 bill, knew that  if they simply went on pretending that $3 bills are legal tender the  hard-left-dominated news media would carefully and continuously look the other  way, pausing occasionally to sneer at anyone who pointed out that, in this  constitutionally crucial respect, the ‘president’ has no clothes,” Monckton  wrote.

“Secondly, not one of the numerous agencies of state, as well as federal  government, whose duty was and is to investigate the Mickey-Mouse ‘birth certificate’  has bothered even to respond to the thousands of requests for investigation put  forward by U.S. citizens.

He said that in Hawaii last year, he watched “as a senior former state  senator called the police and, when they came, handed over to them compelling  evidence that the ‘birth certificate’ had been forged.”

“The police, correctly, passed the file to the state’s attorney general, a  ‘Democrat,’ who did nothing about it,” he said.

“In Washington, D.C., I watched as a concerned citizen from Texas telephoned  the FBI and reported the ‘birth certificate’ as being a forgery. They said they  would send two agents to see him within the hour. No one came.”

‘You tell me about eligibility’

One of the highest profile skeptics has  been billionaire Donald Trump.

Trump said he can’t be certain that Obama is eligible to be president, and he  pointedly noted that a reporter who was poking fun at the issue admitted he  can’t, either.

Trump repeatedly has insisted Obama has not documented his eligibility. At one point, he  offered $5 million to the charity or charities of Obama’s choice if he would  release his passport records and authorize the colleges he attended to release  his applications and other records.

Trump argues that those documents would show whether or not Obama ever  accepted scholarship or other aid as a foreign student, which could preclude him  from being a “natural-born citizen.”

Trump’s conversation with ABC’s Jonathan Karl started with Karl noting that  Trump took on the “not serious” issue of eligibility.

“Why does that make me not serious?” Trump demanded. “I think that resonated  with a lot of people.”

Karl replied: “You don’t still question he was born in the United States, do  you?”

“I have no idea,” Trump said. “I don’t know. Was there a birth certificate?  You tell me. You know some people say that was not his birth certificate. I’m  saying I don’t know. Nobody knows, and you don’t know either. Jonathan you’re a  smart guy, and you don’t know.”

When Karl admitted he was “pretty sure,” Trump jumped on the statement.

“You just said you’re pretty sure … you have to be 100 percent sure,” he  said. “Jonathan, you said you’re pretty convinced, so let’s just see what  happens over time.”

Read  all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth  Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the  subject.

Among the many records the Obama camp has refused to release are the marriage  license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change  records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of  his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism  records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial  aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law  School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with  Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state  senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.

Monckton, citing Zullo’s sworn  affidavit in a court case, published a sworn  mathematical analysis demonstrating the near-zero probability that the White  House “birth certificate” is genuine.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/universe-shattering-twist-in-obama-birth-probe/#Xq5PAbA0rz0Myrdw.99

Advertisements

GOP: Obama lied about health insurance law

with one comment


English: President Barack Obama's signature on...

 

Christian Science Monitor

 

By Brad Knickerbocker Staff writer / November 16, 2013

 

President Obama acknowledges that he was wrong when he said Americans could keep their existing health plans under the Affordable Care Act. He’s apologized, and he’s told insurance companies they should let people keep those plans for a year.

But has that mollified Republicans eager to kill Obamacare, either outright or by draining it of all meaning? No way. If anything, this perceived weakness has them sharpening their political rhetoric.

On Saturday, their designated attacker as much as said Obama lied when he repeatedly assured the public, “If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health-care plan, you will be able to keep your health-care plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what.”

Among the phrases used by Sen. Ron Johnson (R) of Wisconsin in the weekly GOP radio and Internet address: “phony…fraudulent…grand deception…false promises.”

“President Obama’s so-called apology was as phony as his fraudulent marketing of Obamacare,” Sen. Johnson said.

“Those assurances weren’t slight exaggerations or innocent shadings of the truth. They were statements that were fully vetted, coldly calculated, and carefully crafted to deceptively sell your health care plan to a trusting public,” Johnson charged. “It was a political fraud echoed relentlessly by House and Senate Democrats who should be held accountable for the disastrous consequences of their grand deception.”

Consumer fraud this massive in the private sector could – and should – bear serious legal ramifications,” he said. “For President Obama, however, it helped secure enough votes to pass Obamacare, and win reelection.”

Whether or not Obama knew early on that some people would be kicked off their health insurance policies may never be known. There’s no smoking gun – no secret Oval Office tape – so far.

But large numbers of Americans – already fed up with the HealthCare.gov debacle – are not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Asked whether Obama “knowingly deceived the public when he said that if people liked their health insurance plans they would be able to keep them under the 2010 health care law,” 46 percent of respondents in the latest Quinnipiac University National Poll say “yes,” including 17 percent of Democrats and 51 percent of independents. (Forty-seven percent say “no.”)

A new Fox News poll came up with similar results: half of those surveyed believe the president knowingly lied when he made the notorious “you can keep it” pledge, nearly 60 percent believe the administration knew ahead of time that people would have their health insurance policies canceled because of the law, and 55 percent think the White House has “tried to deceive” people about it.

With midterm elections around the corner, Republicans are stalking political prey – especially any Democratic incumbents who voted for Obamacare. And they’re using Obama’s “grand deception,” as Sen. Johnson put it Saturday, in politically predatory fashion.

“There’s nothing more damaging than when your word is devalued and people think they were misled,” Rep. Greg Walden, (R) of Oregon, who heads the National Republican Congressional Committee, the House GOP‘s campaign arm, told the Associated Press. “And especially damaging is when it actually affects you and your family. So in terms of degree of impact, this is off the Richter scale.”

For his part, Obama might have been expected to talk about the Affordable Care Act in his radio and Internet address Saturday.

But at this point, it’s actions instead of words that will be judged. And to dwell on it in this venue – apologizing some more, promising that things will get better with HealthCare.gov – would look like he’s trapped in one issue.

In his address, Obama talked about energy policy.

“Just this week, we learned that for the first time in nearly two decades, the United States of America now produces more of our own oil here at home than we buy from other countries,” he said. “That’s a big deal. That’s a tremendous step towards American energy independence.”

 

 

 

BREAKING NEWS Social Security administration is due to release on Monday Social Security number application for SSN 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel which Obama is fraudulently using

with 2 comments


English: Social Security Administration Office...

Press release, Social Security administration is due to release on Monday Social Security number application for SSN 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel  which Obama is fraudulently using

Law Offices of Orly Ttaitz

For 5 years now Attorney Orly Taitz has pursued the issue of Obama ‘s use of fabricated IDs. the most damning evidence against Obama is his use of Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 , which failed E-Verify and SSNVS and which was traced to Harry Bounel, born in 1890.

Currently there are 7 challenges to Obama brought by Attorney Taitz, two of them are cases specifically dealing with this issue. The cases are slightly different. The latest motion  before Judge Lamberth in DC is based on Obama’s failed E-Verify and his number, which was traced to Bounel. The second case, which was  filed in MD, where SSN administration is located, is filed based on Bounel’s name  and the same Social Security number and the fact that the regime wrongfully denied access to his application, claiming privacy, even though he was born over 120 years ago and privacy no longer applies based on 120 year rule.

Taitz filed a motion for summary judgment. Rod Rosenstein, US attorney for MD, asked presiding judge, Ellen L. Hollander, for more time to respond to a 2 page motion, claiming that 2 weeks were not enough. She granted the request the same day, before the plaintiff could even see the motion to extend time. Shortly thereafter the war or possible war with Syria broke. Now there is a peace agreement, no further distractions, the response id due on Monday and regime ran out of excuses.

Yesterday the regime sent a trial balloon. It published in a couple of blogs (at least one of these blogs is believed to be controlled by the regime)  something to the extent that maybe by a typographical error the information of Bounel and Obama got crossed in one database. They were quoting a researcher Susan Daniels stating that the information about Bounel found by Albert Hendershot  was a one time thing found by one researcher, one error in one database. A number of people, who might be connected to the regime as well, sent Taitz this article to make sure Taitz saw the trial balloon to ascertain  if this latest story would fly.

The answer, it will not fly.

Incidently,  researcher Albert Hendershot was visited by the FBI. When he refused to cooperate, he was tackled, thrown on the ground and handcuffed. At that time he was asked for password for his computers. His computers were taken and in fear of being thrown to jail he gave the password. Hendershot published an article about his experience and published the receipts given to him by the FBI for his computers.  This matter was not litigated yet.

Further on, Attorney Taitz did not submit to court Hendershot’s findings until she had confirmation. Originally, when Taitz talked to investigator Susan Daniels, the investigator said that she could not find Bounel’s information and Taitz did not submit Hendershot’s findings to several courts, including administrative court in GA, where Daniels testified for Taitz.  Later, in a phone conversation Daniels confirmed to Taitz that she found Bounel ‘s information as well. Only when Taitz had this confirmation from a second source, from Daniels, did she submit it to court. Daniels and Hendershot used different databases. Only after Daniels confirmed to Taitz that she found Bounel’s infomation, Taitz contacted Hendershot and related to him that his findings were confirmed by Daniels and he wrote a second article about it.

If need be, Taitz will provide proof of all of the above.

At this point Obama is cornered. He is using a stolen Social Security number and proven computer generated forgeries instead of valid IDs.

This might be related or not, but Dan Pfeifer, Obama strategist, who together with Perkins-Coie attorney, Bob Bauer,presented to the public on April 27, 2011  the forgery of the Obama’s birth certificate, was yesterday taken to the hospital with the stroke like symptoms.

The response is due on Monday, right after Yom Kipur, the Jewish day of atonement. We’ll see what U.S. attorney Rod Rosenstein and  Federal Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander will do.

More information on this and other cases can be found on OrlyTaitzESQ.com.

BREAKING NEWS – FBI Detaining People Connected To Obama Investigations

with 17 comments


By AL HENDERSHOT – Editor of The Obama Hustle – 04/17/2013

On April 10, 2013 the FBI showed up at my front door.  When I answered the door they told me who they were and that they wanted to speak to me about activities with / about the exposed website that was posting information about Muller, Holder, and Obama.

http://web.archive.org/web/20130314220223/http://exposed.su/

Well, obviously, I have nothing to hide so I gave them my computer.  I was also handcuffed while they were talking to me.

Two days later I get a phone call from the FBI telling me that I am not in trouble and that I have nothing to worry about in connection to my activities with others and what I am writing about in my blog www.theobamahustle.wordpress.com  On the 12th I go by the FBI office with a witness, just in case, to pick up my property and again they tell me, “that I am not in trouble and that I have nothing to worry about in connection to my activities with others and what I am writing about in my blog”.

When they were at my house they, the FBI secured my personal information as well such as my SSN and other personal information.  I have no doubt they investigated me out thoroughly and also investigated at what my activities have been in connection to the Obama fraud evidence and others as well.

Later on in the day I received some phone calls from people that I have been working with on the Obama issue.   They, the people that I spoke with said that my activities with the “Cold Case Posse” and my postings on Obama in The Obama Hustle along with the evidence that I have collected on him and his family probably had something to do with my visit from the FBI.

I have not heard of any others being visited by the Feds as it pertains to the exposed website.  In my discussions on Friday we came to the conclusion that this is very interesting in that there must be some people that are worried over what information might be available against the anointed and protected one from his lies being exposed.

I will not be deterred.  I will not be harassed.  I am not afraid.  I will give my life for my country and for what I believe in.  “FREEDOM”.

We are in a fight for our nation from an individual and others who want to destroy the United States of America and transform this great nation into a melting pot and Socialistic paradise for radicals and illegal aliens so they can stay in power.

GOD Bless America and those patriots in this fight against the evil ones that want to enslave us, kill GOD, and kill our babies.

IMG_0003IMG_0001IMG

BREAKING NEWS – IRS: Cheapest Obamacare Plan Will Be $20,000 Per Family

with one comment


English: President Barack Obama's signature on...

By Matt Cover 

(CNSNews.com) – In a final regulation issued Wednesday, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assumed that under Obamacare the cheapest health insurance plan available in 2016 for a family will cost $20,000 for the year.

Under Obamacare, Americans will be required to buy health insurance or pay a penalty to the IRS.

The IRS’s assumption that the cheapest plan for a family will cost $20,000 per year is found in examples the IRS gives to help people understand how to calculate the penalty they will need to pay the government if they do not buy a mandated health plan.

The examples point to families of four and families of five, both of which the IRS expects in its assumptions to pay a minimum of $20,000 per year for a bronze plan.

“The annual national average bronze plan premium for a family of 5 (2 adults, 3 children) is $20,000,” the regulation says.

Bronze will be the lowest tier health-insurance plan available under Obamacare–after Silver, Gold, and Platinum. Under the law, the penalty for not buying health insurance is supposed to be capped at either the annual average Bronze premium, 2.5 percent of taxable income, or $2,085.00 per family in 2016.

In the new final rules published Wednesday, IRS set in law the rules for implementing the penalty Americans must pay if they fail to obey Obamacare’s mandate to buy insurance.

To help illustrate these rules, the IRS presented examples of different situations families might find themselves in.

In the examples, the IRS assumes that families of five who are uninsured would need to pay an average of $20,000 per year to purchase a Bronze plan in 2016.

Using the conditions laid out in the regulations, the IRS calculates that a family earning $120,000 per year that did not buy insurance would need to pay a “penalty” (a word the IRS still uses despite the Supreme Court ruling that it is in fact a “tax”) of $2,400 in 2016.

For those wondering how clear the IRS’s clarifications of this new “penalty” rule are, here is one of the actual examples the IRS gives:

“Example 3. Family without minimum essential coverage.

“(i) In 2016, Taxpayers H and J are married and file a joint return. H and J have three children: K, age 21, L, age 15, and M, age 10. No member of the family has minimum essential coverage for any month in 2016. H and J’s household income is $120,000. H and J’s applicable filing threshold is $24,000. The annual national average bronze plan premium for a family of 5 (2 adults, 3 children) is $20,000.

“(ii) For each month in 2016, under paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (b)(2)(iii) of this section, the applicable dollar amount is $2,780 (($695 x 3 adults) + (($695/2) x 2 children)). Under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, the flat dollar amount is $2,085 (the lesser of $2,780 and $2,085 ($695 x 3)). Under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the excess income amount is $2,400 (($120,000 – $24,000) x 0.025). Therefore, under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the monthly penalty amount is $200 (the greater of $173.75 ($2,085/12) or $200 ($2,400/12)).

“(iii) The sum of the monthly penalty amounts is $2,400 ($200 x 12). The sum of the monthly national average bronze plan premiums is $20,000 ($20,000/12 x 12). Therefore, under paragraph (a) of this section, the shared responsibility payment imposed on H and J for 2016 is $2,400 (the lesser of $2,400 or $20,000).”

– See more at: http://cnsnews.com/node/634414#.US7o2Lkz6CY.facebook

Cry and Howl

Let not him that girdeth on his harness boast himself as he that putteth it off. I Kings 20:11

YouViewed/Editorial

News , Blues and Guns ... Not Necessarily In That Order

For What It's Worth

Greenwich, Connecticut real estate, politics, etc.

Today's News 4 You

Just another WordPress.com site

Mississippi Coal

Kemper Lignite Coal Plant Connections to the United Nations' Projects

The Piratearian

Aye, It's good to be a Pirate!

Texas Tudors' Blog

Tudor and Frederick Ancestors

HwnSurf.info

The Surf Report

The Ohio Conservative

Conservative thought and opinion from the Midwest

theconservativehillbilly

Confronting stupid people with the cold hard conservative fist of truth

Hump Day Report

It's America...We Can Get Over The Hump!

My Very Own Point of View

bits and pieces of what runs through my mind

The Daley Gator

If You're Left, You Just Ain't Right

Socialism is not the Answer

Limited Government Is

2012: What's the 'real' truth?

To find out, I hold a finger in the breeze.

Sparkleplenty27's Campaign Coverage

Political News About the Campaign FACT BASED and Commentary

Old1wordpress's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Real News World Wide

News World Wide, Real News Worldwide, News World Wide, Verified News, Infowars.com, realnewsworldwide.com, world news, headline news, best news

%d bloggers like this: