The Obama Hustle

The Rediscovered Truth About Barack H Obama

Archive for the ‘Joe Biden’ Category

BREAKING NEWS – “Universe-shattering’ twist in Obama birth probe”

with 3 comments


By Bob Unruh WND

The lead investigator in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation of President Obama’s birth certificate says  the case has taken a startling turn, and sheriff’s investigators now are  assisting the Cold Case volunteers.

“When this information is finally exposed to the public, it will be  universe-shattering,” Mike Zullo told WND. “This is beyond the pale of anything  you can imagine.”

But the allegations, he said, which go far beyond a fraudulent birth  certificate, could be public as early as March.

The issue arose once again because of the death Wednesday in Hawaii of state Health  Department chief Loretta Fuddy in a plane crash. She was the official who waived state prohibitions and provided to the White House a copy of a document that Obama presented to the public as his birth certificate.

It’s the document that Arpaio’s investigators have concluded is  fraudulent.

Amid conspiracy theories circulating the Internet, Zullo told WND Friday that  Fuddy’s death – she was the only fatality among nine people aboard a small  airplane that crashed off the coast of Molokai – appears to be a tragic  accident, not foul play.

He said his investigation does not depend on any information from Fuddy.

In an interview today with author and talk-radio host Carl Gallups of  PPSimmons News and Ministry Network and the author of “The  Magic Man in the Sky,” and the new “The  Rabbi who Found Messiah,” Zullo said his investigation of the Obama  fraud case “does not hinge on Ms. Fuddy.”

“While her death certainly is a tragedy, it in no way hampers our  investigation in this matter,” he said. “If people truly believe that her  untimely demise was somehow related to an attempt to silence her for ‘what she  may or may not know,’ then there are several more people in Hawaii who should be  very, very concerned.

“Again, I want to emphasize,” Zullo said, “Sheriff Arpaio and I do not, at  this time, believe her death was connected to any nefarious circumstances.”

The birth certificate dispute dates back to before the 2008 election.  Critics, including Hillary Clinton, raised the issue about Obama’s status as a  “natural-born citizen.” Not defined in the Constitution, it probably was thought  at the time of the writing of the Constitution to be someone born of two citizen  parents.

Obama fails that test because his father was a Kenyan student visiting the  U.S.

Arpaio assigned his Cold Case Posse to look into the issue before the 2012  election, when constituents approached him and asked him to check whether Obama  would be an ineligible candidate on the presidential election ballot.

In a recent radio interview with Gallups, Zullo affirmed the investigation  had been expanded to the county sheriff’s office and was “moving in a direction  that was not anticipated by us.”

“The whole [issue] is more nefarious than you can imagine,” Zullo said,  crediting Arpaio for ordering the investigation and sticking with it.

“He knows in his gut that something is wrong,” Zullo said.

Dozens of lawsuits have been filed without success. One case is pending  before the Alabama Supreme Court for which Zullo provided evidence.

Read  all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth  Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the  subject.

See a report of Fuddy’s death:

Still a live issue

Zullo has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth  certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had  been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a  genuine paper document.

“Mr. Obama has, in fact, not offered any verifiable authoritative document of  any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of  his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event,” he explained.  “One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to  have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together  digitized data from several unknown sources.”

Zullo also has noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an  original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.

See some of Zullo’s evidence:

More recently, Grace  Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the  birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an  expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in  eligibility cases.

“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed  Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,”  Zullo told the World Tribune.

“Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the  news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very  firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used  Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and  called almost immediately.

“There is something wrong with this,” Hayes said.

Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations  and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a  scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured  document created by utilizing material from various sources.”

“In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never  seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my  opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,” he says in the  report.

Investigator  Douglas J. Hagmann of the Northeast Intelligence Network reported this month that in October an affidavit was filed in a court case, under seal, that  purportedly identifies the creator of the Obama birth certificate.

He said Douglas Vogt, an author and the owner and operator of a scanning  business who also has an accounting background, invested over two years in an  investigation of the authenticity of document.

Vogt, along with veteran typesetter Paul Ivey, conducted “exhaustive research  of the document provided to the White House Press Corps on April 27, 2011 – not  the online PDF, a critical distinction that must be understood,” Hagmann  said.

“Using their combined experience of 80 years in this realm, they conducted  extensive examinations of the ‘copy’ that was used as the basis for the PDF  document. They acquired the same type of equipment that was used back in the  late 1950s and early 1960s in an attempt to recreate the document presented as  an ‘authenticated copy’ proving the legitimacy of Barack Obama. Instead, they  found 20 points of forgery on that document and detail each point of forgery in  the affidavit,” wrote Hagmann.

“Even more interesting, Mr. Vogt claims to have identified the ‘signature’ of  the perpetrator, or the woman who created the forged document, hidden within the  document itself. Her identity, in addition to the identity of other conspirators  and their precise methods are contained in a sealed document supplementing the  public affidavit.”

Grounds for impeachment

Last  month, WND columnist Christopher Monckton wrote that the controversy he  calls “Hawaiigate” should be “the central ground of impeachment.”

“First, the dishonesty is shameless and in your face. Mr Obama’s advisers,  once they realized the ‘birth certificate’ was as bogus as a $3 bill, knew that  if they simply went on pretending that $3 bills are legal tender the  hard-left-dominated news media would carefully and continuously look the other  way, pausing occasionally to sneer at anyone who pointed out that, in this  constitutionally crucial respect, the ‘president’ has no clothes,” Monckton  wrote.

“Secondly, not one of the numerous agencies of state, as well as federal  government, whose duty was and is to investigate the Mickey-Mouse ‘birth certificate’  has bothered even to respond to the thousands of requests for investigation put  forward by U.S. citizens.

He said that in Hawaii last year, he watched “as a senior former state  senator called the police and, when they came, handed over to them compelling  evidence that the ‘birth certificate’ had been forged.”

“The police, correctly, passed the file to the state’s attorney general, a  ‘Democrat,’ who did nothing about it,” he said.

“In Washington, D.C., I watched as a concerned citizen from Texas telephoned  the FBI and reported the ‘birth certificate’ as being a forgery. They said they  would send two agents to see him within the hour. No one came.”

‘You tell me about eligibility’

One of the highest profile skeptics has  been billionaire Donald Trump.

Trump said he can’t be certain that Obama is eligible to be president, and he  pointedly noted that a reporter who was poking fun at the issue admitted he  can’t, either.

Trump repeatedly has insisted Obama has not documented his eligibility. At one point, he  offered $5 million to the charity or charities of Obama’s choice if he would  release his passport records and authorize the colleges he attended to release  his applications and other records.

Trump argues that those documents would show whether or not Obama ever  accepted scholarship or other aid as a foreign student, which could preclude him  from being a “natural-born citizen.”

Trump’s conversation with ABC’s Jonathan Karl started with Karl noting that  Trump took on the “not serious” issue of eligibility.

“Why does that make me not serious?” Trump demanded. “I think that resonated  with a lot of people.”

Karl replied: “You don’t still question he was born in the United States, do  you?”

“I have no idea,” Trump said. “I don’t know. Was there a birth certificate?  You tell me. You know some people say that was not his birth certificate. I’m  saying I don’t know. Nobody knows, and you don’t know either. Jonathan you’re a  smart guy, and you don’t know.”

When Karl admitted he was “pretty sure,” Trump jumped on the statement.

“You just said you’re pretty sure … you have to be 100 percent sure,” he  said. “Jonathan, you said you’re pretty convinced, so let’s just see what  happens over time.”

Read  all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth  Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the  subject.

Among the many records the Obama camp has refused to release are the marriage  license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change  records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of  his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism  records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial  aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law  School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with  Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state  senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.

Monckton, citing Zullo’s sworn  affidavit in a court case, published a sworn  mathematical analysis demonstrating the near-zero probability that the White  House “birth certificate” is genuine.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/universe-shattering-twist-in-obama-birth-probe/#Xq5PAbA0rz0Myrdw.99

Advertisements

BREAKING NEWS Social Security administration is due to release on Monday Social Security number application for SSN 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel which Obama is fraudulently using

with 2 comments


English: Social Security Administration Office...

Press release, Social Security administration is due to release on Monday Social Security number application for SSN 042-68-4425 of Harry Bounel  which Obama is fraudulently using

Law Offices of Orly Ttaitz

For 5 years now Attorney Orly Taitz has pursued the issue of Obama ‘s use of fabricated IDs. the most damning evidence against Obama is his use of Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 , which failed E-Verify and SSNVS and which was traced to Harry Bounel, born in 1890.

Currently there are 7 challenges to Obama brought by Attorney Taitz, two of them are cases specifically dealing with this issue. The cases are slightly different. The latest motion  before Judge Lamberth in DC is based on Obama’s failed E-Verify and his number, which was traced to Bounel. The second case, which was  filed in MD, where SSN administration is located, is filed based on Bounel’s name  and the same Social Security number and the fact that the regime wrongfully denied access to his application, claiming privacy, even though he was born over 120 years ago and privacy no longer applies based on 120 year rule.

Taitz filed a motion for summary judgment. Rod Rosenstein, US attorney for MD, asked presiding judge, Ellen L. Hollander, for more time to respond to a 2 page motion, claiming that 2 weeks were not enough. She granted the request the same day, before the plaintiff could even see the motion to extend time. Shortly thereafter the war or possible war with Syria broke. Now there is a peace agreement, no further distractions, the response id due on Monday and regime ran out of excuses.

Yesterday the regime sent a trial balloon. It published in a couple of blogs (at least one of these blogs is believed to be controlled by the regime)  something to the extent that maybe by a typographical error the information of Bounel and Obama got crossed in one database. They were quoting a researcher Susan Daniels stating that the information about Bounel found by Albert Hendershot  was a one time thing found by one researcher, one error in one database. A number of people, who might be connected to the regime as well, sent Taitz this article to make sure Taitz saw the trial balloon to ascertain  if this latest story would fly.

The answer, it will not fly.

Incidently,  researcher Albert Hendershot was visited by the FBI. When he refused to cooperate, he was tackled, thrown on the ground and handcuffed. At that time he was asked for password for his computers. His computers were taken and in fear of being thrown to jail he gave the password. Hendershot published an article about his experience and published the receipts given to him by the FBI for his computers.  This matter was not litigated yet.

Further on, Attorney Taitz did not submit to court Hendershot’s findings until she had confirmation. Originally, when Taitz talked to investigator Susan Daniels, the investigator said that she could not find Bounel’s information and Taitz did not submit Hendershot’s findings to several courts, including administrative court in GA, where Daniels testified for Taitz.  Later, in a phone conversation Daniels confirmed to Taitz that she found Bounel ‘s information as well. Only when Taitz had this confirmation from a second source, from Daniels, did she submit it to court. Daniels and Hendershot used different databases. Only after Daniels confirmed to Taitz that she found Bounel’s infomation, Taitz contacted Hendershot and related to him that his findings were confirmed by Daniels and he wrote a second article about it.

If need be, Taitz will provide proof of all of the above.

At this point Obama is cornered. He is using a stolen Social Security number and proven computer generated forgeries instead of valid IDs.

This might be related or not, but Dan Pfeifer, Obama strategist, who together with Perkins-Coie attorney, Bob Bauer,presented to the public on April 27, 2011  the forgery of the Obama’s birth certificate, was yesterday taken to the hospital with the stroke like symptoms.

The response is due on Monday, right after Yom Kipur, the Jewish day of atonement. We’ll see what U.S. attorney Rod Rosenstein and  Federal Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander will do.

More information on this and other cases can be found on OrlyTaitzESQ.com.

BREAKING NEWS – The dam bursts on Benghazi

with 6 comments


By Paul Brandus | The Week

Thanks to a bombshell report from ABC News, GOP accusations that the White House politicized a tragedy no longer seem so unsubstantiated

For a long time, the Republican hunt for the truth surrounding the Benghazi terror attack has reminded me of one of President Reagan‘s favorite jokes. It concerns a little boy whose parents worried he was too optimistic. So they took him to a psychiatrist. Trying to dampen his spirits, the doctor led the boy into a room piled high with horse manure. The boy unexpectedly squealed with delight and began digging through it. “What on earth are you doing?” the psychiatrist asked.
“With all this manure,” the boy replied, “there must be a pony in here somewhere.”
And so it is with Benghazi. Republicans, convinced that the American people are being hoodwinked by the Obama administration, have been digging through the doo-doo for eight months. There must be a conspiracy and cover-up in here somewhere, they think. There must be.
The White House has scoffed at this witch hunt for months. But this week, it’s looking like they’re the ones standing in the doo-doo — playing politics, it seems, with tragedy.
The administration has long maintained that the now-infamous talking points used by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice on five Sunday talk shows just days after the September 11 attack were the product of the intelligence community. We know the talking points originated in the intelligence community. But the final product itself? No.

ABC News reports that the documents were heavily edited by the State Department. And not just edited, but censored: State requested that references to Ansar al-Sharia — tied to al Qaeda — be deleted. It also requested that references to CIA warnings about terror threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack be deleted as well. (Read the whole ABC story here.)

Rewind to November 28. Here’s what White House press secretary Jay Carney told us at that day’s press briefing:

Those talking points originated from the intelligence community (IC). They reflect the IC’s best assessments of what they thought had happened. The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment (emphasis added) that was made to those talking points by either of those two institutions were changing the word ‘consulate’ to ‘diplomatic facility’ because ‘consulate’ was inaccurate.

And Carney just two days ago stuck to this story, telling us: 

The only edits made by anyone here at the White House were stylistic and nonsubstantive. They corrected the description of the building or the facility in Benghazi from consulate to diplomatic facility and the like. And ultimately, this all has been discussed and reviewed and provided in enormous levels of detail by the administration to congressional investigators, and the attempt to politicize the talking points, again, is part of an effort to, you know, chase after what isn’t the substance here.

Carney’s phrase “here at the White House” may be accurate in the physical sense, but in the broader context there’s no question he was referring to the Obama administration at large. And as Stephen Hayes of The Weekly Standard — which first published some of the email traffic between the White House and State Department on this — charged, “senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what happened.”

So who at the State Department was involved in changing — and censoring — the talking points? According to one email, spokesperson Victoria Nuland — who reported to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — expressed specific concern about this particular CIA talking point:

The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa’ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya. These noted that, since April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British Ambassador’s convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks. [Via ABC News]

Is there a White House connection? ABC notes that in a Sept. 14 email — two days before Rice went on TV — Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes said the State Department’s concerns needed to be addressed.
“We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department,” Rhodes noted.
The final talking points eventually given to Rice reflected State’s concerns, but Carney told us that it’s all on the up-and-up because the changes were signed off on by the CIA.

There’s a meatpacking-like quality to all this. You don’t really want to know how your hamburger is processed, do you? The administration’s defense — and it’s looking thinner than ice on a late spring pond — is that government bureaucracy is messy and multi-layered and that’s a big part of why Rice said what she did.
Benghazi occurred seven weeks before election day. The administration’s strategy was simple: Downplay the terror attack, change the narrative, and run out the clock. And that’s what it did.

But now the dam has burst. Carney’s “here at the White House” comment has essentially thrown Clinton under the bus. Republicans, who leaked the edited emails to Karl and Hayes, have succeeded on two fronts: They’ve got the administration on the defensive over Benghazi, and they’ve weakened the Democrat’s most formidable 2016 candidate.

It seems that after all that digging, Republicans have found their pony at last.

Staffer for Vice President Biden forces student reporter to delete photos

leave a comment »


Official portrait of Vice President of the Uni...

The Daily Caller

A press office staffer for Vice President Joe Biden forced a credentialed reporter from the University of Maryland’s Philip Merrill College of Journalism to delete photos taken Tuesday at an event in the Washington, D.C. suburb of Rockville, Md.

Vice President Joe Biden’s press secretary, Kendra Barkoff, has since apologized for the thuggery.

The University of Maryland’s student-run Capital News Service has the story.

The reporter, Jeremy Barr, showed up to cover an event related to domestic violence. Biden, Attorney General Eric Holder and Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin were on hand.

The trouble began when he unintentionally took a seat in an area that wasn’t specifically designated for members of the press.

“I didn’t see any demarcation that would have designated a press entrance versus a general entrance,” Barr told Capital News Service.

Once the event started, Barr said, he snapped a few photos of each speaker.

“People a few rows in front of me were also taking photos,” he added.

When the event ended, Biden press staffer Dana Rosenzweig questioned Barr about his photos, according to the New York Daily News.

“She said, ‘I need to see your camera right now,’” Barr told CNS.

“I assumed that I’d violated a protocol,” the student reporter added. “I gave her the benefit of the doubt that she was following proper procedures.”

Rosenzweig’s rationale was that Barr’s presence in an area of the crowd that wasn’t designated specifically for the press gave him an “unfair advantage” over other nearby media representatives at the event.

It’s unclear what this advantage could have been.

Biden’s staffer then made Barr delete all the photos from his camera. She watched him the whole time to make sure he obeyed. She also scrutinized his iPhone to confirm that he didn’t save any photos.

Rosenzweig wasn’t done violating Barr’s rights just yet. She told him to wait while she found her boss. After about 10 minutes, the staffer told Barr she was terribly sorry, and allowed him to leave.

Lucy A. Dalglish, dean of the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland, later filed a formal complaint with the vice president’s press office.

Dalglish informed Biden’s press secretary that her staffer had broken a federal law (the violation of the First Amendment notwithstanding).

“This was pure intimidation,” Dalglish told CNS. “It’s clear from the circumstance that the journalist did nothing wrong.”

This incident follows an enduring pattern of heavy-handed behavior by Biden’s staff toward the press.

In August 2012, Biden’s staff was busted trying to convince journalists not to report a host of ridiculous things Biden had said, according to Fox News.

In 2011, as ABC News reported, Biden’s coterie had to apologize for forcing a reporter to stand in a closet for an hour.

Cry and Howl

Let not him that girdeth on his harness boast himself as he that putteth it off. I Kings 20:11

YouViewed/Editorial

News , Blues and Guns ... Not Necessarily In That Order

For What It's Worth

Greenwich, Connecticut real estate, politics, etc.

Today's News 4 You

Just another WordPress.com site

Mississippi Coal

Kemper Lignite Coal Plant Connections to the United Nations' Projects

The Piratearian

Aye, It's good to be a Pirate!

Texas Tudors' Blog

Tudor and Frederick Ancestors

HWNSURF.INFO

Twilight Zone

The Ohio Conservative

Conservative thought and opinion from the Midwest

theconservativehillbilly

Confronting stupid people with the cold hard conservative fist of truth

Hump Day Report

It's America...We Can Get Over The Hump!

My Very Own Point of View

bits and pieces of what runs through my mind

The Daley Gator

If You're Left, You Just Ain't Right

Socialism is not the Answer

Limited Government Is

2012: What's the 'real' truth?

To find out, I hold a finger in the breeze.

Sparkleplenty27's Campaign Coverage

Political News About the Campaign FACT BASED and Commentary

Old1wordpress's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Real News World Wide

News World Wide, Real News Worldwide, News World Wide, Verified News, Infowars.com, realnewsworldwide.com, world news, headline news, best news

%d bloggers like this: